Sorry for the late follow up on this one.
Even after pruning JIRA of non-important issues targeted for 5.6 there
are still several ones open and I suspect it would take more than two
weeks. So while I would generally agree with Gunnar's suggestion to
try hard to not overlap work on active branches
Hi,
What's still missing from releasing 5.6 (compatible with ORM 5.0/5.1),
labelling the ES support as a "tech preview"?
I'd hope we could do such release rather quickly after you re-focus from
OGM to HSEARCH? Calling the ES support a "tech preview" will allow us to
release something a bit less p
On 11 August 2016 at 14:36, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi Sanne,
>
> I had the same thought a few days ago. At Open Wide, we used to follow
> the ORM versions very closely and we usually had a corresponding
> Search version very soon.
>
> I agree we need to release something compatible with ORM 5.2 s
Hi Sanne,
I had the same thought a few days ago. At Open Wide, we used to follow
the ORM versions very closely and we usually had a corresponding
Search version very soon.
I agree we need to release something compatible with ORM 5.2 sooner
rather than later.
I understand your concern about bring
