[hibernate-dev] Starting 5.2.15 release

*Please do not push anything to 5.2 branch.Thanks,Andrea* ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

[hibernate-dev] Hibernate ORM 5.2.15.Final has been released

*For details:http://in.relation.to/2018/03/08/hibernate-orm-5215-final-release * ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org

Re: [hibernate-dev] HHH-12372 Restore binary compatibility with applications using the legacy Session#getFlushMode() method

On 8 March 2018 at 02:44, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:59 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> good news on the backwards compatibility; David suggested we could use >> his "bridger" tool to have the Session API binary

[hibernate-dev] Hibernate Validator 6.0.8.Final

Hi, We just released Hibernate Validator 6.0.8.Final with: - constraint validator payload - some performance improvements - a couple of bugfixes More information in the blog post: http://in.relation.to/2018/03/08/hibernate-validator-608-final-out/ . Have a nice day. -- Guillaume

Re: [hibernate-dev] HHH-12372 Restore binary compatibility with applications using the legacy Session#getFlushMode() method

Sanne - On 03/07/2018 07:58 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > # Fix some pending problem with Envers: it's no longer compiling as a > non-abstract extension of Session doesn't implement getFlushMode; > might be tricky or not, I've not looked yet. I assume this is due to

Re: [hibernate-dev] Is unidirectional one-to-one referencing a non-primary key valid

For sure our model can handle this mapping, although maybe only from the other side (that's generally the more natural mapping) - internally it's called a "logical many-to-one". Personally I'd say there is nothing wrong with the mapping per-se. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:36 PM Gail Badner

Re: [hibernate-dev] Is unidirectional one-to-one referencing a non-primary key valid

Hi Steve, I know that a bidirectional one-to-one association works properly with Product#productInfo on the "mappedBy" side, and ProductInfo#product on the owning side. With that mapping, ProductInfo#product is a ManyToOne that is a "logical" OneToOne. I agree that is the more natural way to map

Re: [hibernate-dev] Is unidirectional one-to-one referencing a non-primary key valid

Well now you are asking 2 different questions I think: 1) Is this a conceptually valid mapping? Which is what you explicitly asked originally. I said that imo the mapping itself is conceptually valid. 2) Do we support this? Clearly not. More in line... On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 4:38 PM Gail

Re: [hibernate-dev] HHH-12372 Restore binary compatibility with applications using the legacy Session#getFlushMode() method

On 8 March 2018 at 14:55, Chris Cranford wrote: > Sanne - > > On 03/07/2018 07:58 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> # Fix some pending problem with Envers: it's no longer compiling as a >> non-abstract extension of Session doesn't implement getFlushMode; >> might be tricky or