I can't seem to find a way to set the query.imports property
when using the JMX configuration service with JBoss. Am I
missing something or did it slip through the cracks?
Thanks,
Rod
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Ente
I hate to ask, but I'm having a problem I just can
track down.. maybe someone can help...
I currently have serveral objects which all have
the following relationship to an Audit/Note object where administrators can add
a note about a specific object (user account, system device, etc):
>> I INDEED need a under !
My Top-level (not nested) table has a key column
and element column (integer). However the element
column is a foreign key (many-to-one) to another table <<
I'm sorry how is this not a many-to-many??
---
--- Viktor Szathmary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:32:39 +1100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> > Are there proxies involved?
> >
>
> hopefully not :) it seems that there's actually two
> calls to
> nestedChild.setParent() on the same nestedChild
> instance - the s
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> U.
>
>
> You should use or
>
> makes no sense at all.
I INDEED need a under !
My Top-level (not nested) table has a key column
and element column (integer). However the element
column is a foreign key (many-to-one) to another table
(B in the ex
U.
You should use or
makes no sense at all.
jiesheng zhang
I have one usage scenario as below:
The classes could be like this.
public class Person {
...
List Addresses; //A list of Address objects.
}
public class Address {
...
List types; //A list of AddressType object
}
public class AddressType {
long typenum;
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:04:51 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Yeah, don't worry about the call from deepCopy(). I removed that
> in the latest CVS, since it was unnecessary. It should not have been
> actually *harmful*, however.
i was using hib2b2.. and i've also removed any usage of ... so
Yeah, don't worry about the call from deepCopy(). I removed that
in the latest CVS, since it was unnecessary. It should not have been
actually *harmful*, however.
hi,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:32:39 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Are there proxies involved?
>
hopefully not :) it seems that there's actually two calls to
nestedChild.setParent() on the same nestedChild instance - the second one
occurs during deepCopy, and blows away the value that was set f
10 matches
Mail list logo