Re: [Hibernate] RE: Hibernate test cases

2004-12-27 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:54:31 +0530, Soundaian, Kamalakannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Can someone give me all the test cases for hibernate? I mean't the junit test cases. eh ? its in CVS - go get them there ,) -max Thanks in advance kamal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTEC

[Hibernate] RE: Hibernate test cases

2004-12-27 Thread Soundaian, Kamalakannan
Hi all, Can someone give me all the test cases for hibernate? I mean't the junit test cases. Thanks in advance kamal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 6:11 AM To: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: hibernate-

Re: [Hibernate] Startup performance revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Binil Thomas
Hi Christian, On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:25:24 +0200, Christian Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Binil Thomas wrote: > > > It isnt. An unloaded proxy can throw an Exception if it is accessed > > when detached. > > But what we want to know is cost of serializing an entity with these > > proxies. >

Re: [Hibernate] Startup performance revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Christian Bauer
Binil Thomas wrote: It isnt. An unloaded proxy can throw an Exception if it is accessed when detached. But what we want to know is cost of serializing an entity with these proxies. I don't know, but I'd say serialization implies a slow process itself (ie. for remote communication) and the proxies

[Hibernate] Stored Procedure support revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
Hi Guys, It must be the holidays that make me go revisiting stuff ,) This time it is SP support in H3. I *think* I can add it in a couple of hours (at least as a first attempt ,), but want to throw the issues/solution out there for you to look at before doing the necessary changes. Currently w

Re: [Hibernate] Count method

2004-12-27 Thread Greg Handi
+1 I'm definitely all for it! About time too! --- Christian Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about some christmas controversy (or christmas present, depending > on > your position): > > +1 for applying the Criteria.count() patch in 2.1.8 and be done with > it > for Hibernate2. If we are

Re: [Hibernate] Startup performance revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:28:04 +0100 (CET), Emmanuel Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If 1 day in 2005 you can run the tests on annotations, it would be great. I'm wondering how the XML 40% become using annotations. My guess is that if annotations "reflection" is ok it will be similar to seriali

Re: [Hibernate] Startup performance revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:16:15 +0530, Binil Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Max, Couple of months ago we were evaluating the use of Hibernate, and were ran some performance comparisons between popular ORM tools. One of the things we noticed is that serialization of lazy initialization poxies

Re: [Hibernate] Startup performance revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Christian Bauer
Binil Thomas wrote: I admit that when using Hibernate entities as DTOs the proxy fields should be nulled out, ideally. But a null is not the same as an unloaded object. I think this was discussed a few times before. -- Christian Bauer +49 171 455 66 53 callto://christian-bauer Hibernate [EMAIL P

Re: [Hibernate] Startup performance revisited...

2004-12-27 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
If 1 day in 2005 you can run the tests on annotations, it would be great. I'm wondering how the XML 40% become using annotations. --- Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi guys, > > Just reran a set of startup performance tests, to > see if something has > changed or I would