Re: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-28 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
2) I've fixed the XMLDataBinder one. There is still 1 failure on refresh with lock mode (MasterDetailTest). The LockMode seems not to be applied. This part is still too obscure for me. Joshua Davis wrote: Should I add the task to the build file so that I can compile with 1.4? 1) It still doesn't

Re: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-28 Thread Simon Spero
Joshua Davis wrote: 1) It still doesn't compile with 1.4. 2) There are still unit test failures. I had a few problems building with generics-ea-2.4: The problem was due to the change in the method signature in ObjectFactory; the generics compiler doesn't have the updated inteface in its stubs

RE: Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-27 Thread Joshua Davis
EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Emmanuel Bernard > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD > > Hibernate want to stay JDK 1.3 backward compatible, AFAIK. > Thus it has to be compilable with a good old JDK 1

Re: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Gavin King
Yes, we just need a little Ant to weed out the offending in that one file. Emmanuel Bernard wrote: Hibernate want to stay JDK 1.3 backward compatible, AFAIK. Thus it has to be compilable with a good old JDK 1.3 :-) We need to make the ant process tolerant. -- Emmanuel Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
Hibernate want to stay JDK 1.3 backward compatible, AFAIK. Thus it has to be compilable with a good old JDK 1.3 :-) We need to make the ant process tolerant. -- Emmanuel Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Jun 24, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> Is it not too big a step to have jdk 1

Re[4]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
Hello Simon, > Fortunately, 2.4 has a magic target, jsr14, which generate 1.4 format > class with no problems. There are comments in the source code that say > that this flag might go away in the future. exactly - they did not deliver what they promised me and the rest of the world ;) /max >

Re: Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Simon Spero
On Jun 24, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: Is it not too big a step to have jdk 1.5 compile AND runtime dependency on the core ? (sun's promise of jdk 1.4 compability generics did not hold as i've been told ;( It is still possible to generate compile and run generics under 1.4 using

Re: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Christian Bauer
On Jun 24, 2004, at 8:07 AM, Joshua Davis wrote: I've been thinking that maybe a nightly build would be a Good Thing(TM). Maybe I'll set up a JDK1.4 nightly build on my Linux box. It's on the TODO, waiting for our new server machine. -- Christian Bauer +49 171 455 66 53 Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Joshua Davis
2004 8:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > On Jun 24, 2004, at 6:44 AM, Joshua Davis wrote: > > > >

RE: Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Joshua Davis
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > On Jun 24, 2004, at 6:44 AM, Joshua Davis wrote: > > >> A few questions about Hibernate3 HEAD: > >> > >> * Should Hibernate3 HEAD only compile with JDK1.5? > > > public Object getObjectInstance(Object refe

Re[2]: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
Hello Christian, Thursday, June 24, 2004, 6:55:57 PM, you wrote: > On Jun 24, 2004, at 6:44 AM, Joshua Davis wrote: >> A few questions about Hibernate3 HEAD: >> >> * Should Hibernate3 HEAD only compile with JDK1.5? > public Object getObjectInstance(Object reference, Name name, Context > ctx, H

RE: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Joshua Davis
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > A few questions about Hibernate3 HEAD: > > * Should Hibernate3 HEAD only compile with JDK1.5? > > No. > > The only jdk1.5 dependency is in hibernateext/annotation > which is not part of hibernate core. U

Re: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Christian Bauer
On Jun 24, 2004, at 6:44 AM, Joshua Davis wrote: A few questions about Hibernate3 HEAD: * Should Hibernate3 HEAD only compile with JDK1.5? public Object getObjectInstance(Object reference, Name name, Context ctx, Hashtable env) in org.hibernate.impl.SessionFactoryObjectFactory.java added by Gavin

Re: [Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
Hello Joshua, Thursday, June 24, 2004, 12:44:06 PM, you wrote: > A few questions about Hibernate3 HEAD: > * Should Hibernate3 HEAD only compile with JDK1.5? No. The only jdk1.5 dependency is in hibernateext/annotation which is not part of hibernate core. > * test/org/hibernate/test/Multiplici

[Hibernate] Hibernate3 HEAD

2004-06-24 Thread Joshua Davis
A few questions about Hibernate3 HEAD: * Should Hibernate3 HEAD only compile with JDK1.5? * test/org/hibernate/test/MultiplicityType.java doesn't seem to compile. Is that right? --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Train