AW: AW: [Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index

: development Hibernate Cc: Woelke, Milan Betreff: Re: AW: [Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index On Mar 7, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Woelke, Milan wrote: > This could work, if i were using hbm files. but as i told im using > hibernate as ejb 3 persistence pr

Re: AW: [Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index

On Mar 7, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Woelke, Milan wrote: This could work, if i were using hbm files. but as i told im using hibernate as ejb 3 persistence provider. Im not aware of any way to specify this with ejb3 annotations. Could you please reconsider your answer. Please go to the forum, thi

AW: [Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. März 2006 19:01 An: Woelke, Milan; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: RE: [Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index Or, you could just specify an index on the : ... -Original Message- From

RE: [Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index

deadlock due to missing foreign key index Hi, I have a problem with hibernate bundled with jboss 4.0.4 as ejb 3.0 persistence provider. Before you skip my post, as just a misguided user question, please continue to read. First a scenario: We have two classes Order and Position, which are part of a

[Hibernate] bug or feature: oracle deadlock due to missing foreign key index

Hi, I have a problem with hibernate bundled with jboss 4.0.4 as ejb 3.0 persistence provider. Before you skip my post, as just a misguided user question, please continue to read. First a scenario: We have two classes Order and Position, which are part of a bidirectional OneToMany relationship.