On May 28, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not
> "just" where the assocation is already defined ?
>
>
> ...
>
>...
>
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
> Where the name could actually be comma seperat
and if that is what it takes, then let that be it ;)
/max
Exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not
"just"
where the assocation is already defined ?
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hib
Exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
> And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not
"just"
> where the assocation is already defined ?
---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost a
It occurred to me today that you could avoid my objection just by
defining the fetch profile in its own section of the XML, instead of in
the association mappings. eg.
And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not "just"
where the assocation is already def
