Re: [Hibernate] Re: Re: CGLIB2

2003-10-28 Thread Gavin King
Wouldn't that mean that we would get both versions of CGLIB in our lib directory? Perhaps its better to just wait until Proxool has also upgraded. Perhaps we can put some pressure on them to get up to date. Chris Nokleberg wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:03:06PM +1100, Gavin King wrote:

Re: [Hibernate] Re: Re: CGLIB2

2003-10-28 Thread Gavin King
Ummm not sure. It is a fairly complex patch, to core functionality. And I am not yet 100% on accepting it (I'm about 80%). I think we would need to go though a beta5 for this. David Morris wrote: Gavin, Is there any possibility of getting the JDBC 3.0 getGeneratedKeys patch applied and into 2.

Re: [Hibernate] Re: Re: CGLIB2

2003-10-28 Thread David Morris
Gavin, Is there any possibility of getting the JDBC 3.0 getGeneratedKeys patch applied and into 2.1? I picked up the last round of changes and can build another updated patch for you later this evening if it would help. Thanks, David Morris >>Ah. hm. I am actually ready to release 2.1rc1. J

Re: [Hibernate] Re: Re: CGLIB2

2003-10-27 Thread Gavin King
OK. You wanna make a patch? The CVS branch is v21branch. Chris Nokleberg wrote: Gavin King wrote: Ah. hm. I am actually ready to release 2.1rc1. Just waiting on Bela's stuff. Exactly how beta is "beta"? Not very beta? :-) Of course there may be some minor API changes going forward, b