Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering tool

2002-11-11 Thread Gavin King
ainly with envy or any system based on locking). Gavin - Original Message - From: "Andrea Aime" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gavin King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Daniel Bradby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, Novemb

Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering tool

2002-11-11 Thread Gavin King
> I think you can spell both the verb and the noun with 's' or 'c' Thanks for clearing that up :) I was playing with your SchemaUpdater today (getting it working as a commandline tool). I made a change to get it working with DB2 that I'm not too happy about: I had to change the schema name to "%

Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering tool

2002-11-11 Thread Christoph Sturm
Hey Gavin! - Original Message - From: "Gavin King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Daniel Bradby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 12:48 AM Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering

Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering tool

2002-11-09 Thread Andrea Aime
On Friday 08 November 2002 23:48, Gavin King wrote: > > Can we move towards the "best practise" of having one mapping per class > > maybe? > > Yeah, I already requested that (theres a thread in the forum). > But why is a best practice? One file per class requires, say, ten open editors to have a

Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering tool

2002-11-09 Thread Gavin King
> Can we move towards the "best practise" of having one mapping per class > maybe? Yeah, I already requested that (theres a thread in the forum). P.S. Do I spell practice right? Should it be a 'c' or an 's'? I don't care about US-style spelling or whatever, but there are two words, right, a verb

Re: [Hibernate] Tom Cellucci's database reverse engineering tool

2002-11-08 Thread Daniel Bradby
Awesome! I just pointed it at a MySQL database I had here and it worked great. Can't wait to see it cleaned up and put into CVS I might try it against some more complex schema at work next week. Can we move towards the "best practise" of having one mapping per class maybe? Gavin King wrote: H