> Don't you mean the element?
Of course.
> Is constrained="false" equivalent to the way it currently works (and I
> assume will remain the default)?
yes.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Ge
Gavin_King/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is now implemented as an optional attibute constrained="true|false" on
the element.
Don't you mean the element? Is constrained="false"
equivalent to the way it currently works (and I assume will remain the
default)?
Thanks,
-Mark
---
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: This is now implemented as an optional attibute
constrained="true|false
Gavin_King/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we should add something like:
and a matching
or something like that
That sounds perfect. Any chance of this happening in the near future?
I'm sort of at a dead end at the moment because of this. I was hoping
to use the Lifecycle interface t
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: Yeah, this is interesting. This problem is specific to
one-to-one assoc
