[Hibernate-devel] JCS integration

2002-07-25 Thread Gavin_King/Cirrus%CIRRUS
Christian Meunier got me started with some code to integrate Apache Tubine's JCS today. I ended up rewriting much of the Cache package and making some big improvements. Anyway, you may now specify a JCS cache in the mapping file using or You must then configure the cache in the resource /

Re: [Hibernate-devel] Documentation in DocBook

2002-07-25 Thread Gavin_King/Cirrus%CIRRUS
>>- Move chapters and sections around for a more consistent read >Done. I hope this is an improvement. I need more time to think some of the reordering through the previous order was designed to get people started as quick as possible ... topics went from "basic" to "advanced". The new orde

RE: [Hibernate-devel] JCS integration

2002-07-25 Thread Urberg, John
Is a JCS cache serializable? If so, how much more would it take to pass the whole session over the wire? Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Gavin_King/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Gavin_King/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT

[Hibernate-devel] Re: JCS integration

2002-07-25 Thread Christian Meunier
You rock ;) There is something that could be considered as a future upgrade. Atm each persistent class will have its own region cache, it might be usefull to be able to put more than one persistent class in a region cache. We could specify the following in the cache interface: public void setCla

Re: [Hibernate-devel] Documentation in DocBook

2002-07-25 Thread Gavin_King/Cirrus%CIRRUS
>> 3. I think the persistent-classes and basic-or-mapping sections should come >> before the session-configuration section. Otherwise the order seems good. >Hm. My first approach would be to read the "how to get it up and >running; aka configuration" and after that I will look into how to do >ba

Re: [Hibernate-devel] Documentation in DocBook

2002-07-25 Thread Christian Bauer
On 25 Jul (11:53), Gavin_King/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I need more time to think some of the reordering through the > previous order was designed to get people started as quick as > possible ... topics went from "basic" to "advanced". The new > ordering is much more by subject which makes i