[Hibernate] sourceforge most active

2002-10-10 Thread Brad Clow
yesterday i want to sourceforge, and hibernate had made it into the top 10 "most active" list on the left-hand side.   u people have been busy :-)   brad

Re: [Hibernate] Long transactions, object update and many-to-one...

2002-10-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Francois Beausoleil wrote: Hello Andrea, This has already been implemented. See Session.disconnect() in the documentation. Hope that helps ! Bye, Francois My application is a J2EE application, with both swing and html interfaces (the latter is more limited, for the public, the former is for

Re: [Hibernate] Long transactions, object update and many-to-one...

2002-10-10 Thread Gavin King
An even better (and much easier to implement) approach might be to simply skip the nullification if the identifier of the transient instance indicates that it already exists on the database. Thats easy to implement. You wanna take a stab at it Andrea? Gavin - Original Message - From: "An

[Hibernate] Long transactions, object update and many-to-one...

2002-10-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi everybody, I have a little feature request/question for you. Suppose you have two beans Customer, Country, and Customer has a many-to-one property of type Country (not-null). In a long transaction I load all of the Countries to fill in a JCombobox in a form to input a new Customer. Then, when th

Re: [Hibernate] Looking for Volunteers

2002-10-10 Thread Gavin King
Well, this email took about 24 hours to be delivered. In the meantime > * SchemaExport support (and proper support in the mapping document) 80% done > * Query language integration (the hard bit) done (not so hard after all) > * Support for outerjoin fetching still up for grabs > * Support fo

Re: [Hibernate] Long transactions, object update and many-to-one...

2002-10-10 Thread Andrea Aime
Gavin King wrote: An even better (and much easier to implement) approach might be to simply skip the nullification if the identifier of the transient instance indicates that it already exists on the database. Yep, it would be faster... Thats easy to implement. You wanna take a stab at it Andre