Ben,
I will wait for your response on reading -18.
Passover is this week and I am swamped. I have one more DRIP draft to
push out before the ASTM virtual meeting later this week.
Perhaps Monday during the middle days I can read all your responses and
work up the -19 ver.
Bob
On 4/5/20
Hi Bob,
Sorry this dropped off my radar for so long -- I got really swamped.
Just a few notes inline, as I'll focus on reading the -18.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 04:00:33PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 3/4/20 12:44 PM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> > Benjamin Kaduk has
Ben,
In ver 18 I have replaced "Perfect Forward Secrecy" with "Forward Secrecy".
That seems to be a consensus on saag.
Please let me know where you stand on my various responses.
Thank you
Bob
On 3/18/20 11:50 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have pushed out ver 17
I believe with this I have
I have pushed out ver 17
I believe with this I have done my best at answering all the AD
questions/comments.
At least one open item on the octet encoding.
Please review this version and my responses to Roman and Ben and let's
collect the last set of changes to wrap this up.
On 3/9/20
Ben,
thank you for the serious, in-depth, review. It will take a bit to work
through your comments.
vis-a-vis, LAKE.
It would be seriously challenging, and interesting, to review the
long-standing work on HIP-DEX with the new work on LAKE. If so, I would
end up throwing in to remove all
