Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Hi, FYI, current OpenHIP development for v2 and DRIP happens actively here https://bitbucket.org/openhip/workspace/projects/OP br Andrei -- Andrei Gurtov, PhD, ACM Distinguished Scientist Professor, LiU, Sweden Vice-chair, IEEE Sweden https://www.ida.liu.se/~andgu38/ On 9/22/2020 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Eric, > > your email below arrived during my summer vacation. I am catching up on stuff > now. > > Please, note that the 3 links provided below point to a paper from 2013, to a > repo where the last commit is from 2011, and to a repo where the last commit > was performed 10 years ago. Are you sure you want that type of completely > out-of-date information in the writeup? > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > >> -Original Message- >> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) >> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 16:18 >> To: Miika Komu ; hipsec@ietf.org >> Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo >> Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations >> >> Thank you Miika for these pieces of information. >> >> Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind >> updating the write-up with this list of implementations? >> >> For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP- >> NAT document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we >> need to get DEX through >> >> -éric >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Miika Komu >> Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50 >> To: Eric Vyncke , "hipsec@ietf.org" >> Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo >> Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti: >> > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents] >> > >> > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be >> > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX. >> >> sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of >> three implementations (no idea about interoperability): >> >> 1. Contiki-based implementation >> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_- >> _A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things >> >> 2. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9d0fb0d6-c3af5042- >> 9d0ff04d-86d2114eab2f-a5a60a52da996ac0=1=533f7f17-d75e-4aff- >> a064- >> c679cfd0273b=https%3A%2F%2Fcode.google.com%2Farchive%2Fp%2Fhip- >> dex%2F >> >> 3. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5c05a7d-ab60bae9- >> f5c01ae6-86d2114eab2f-d4d4be7ca0b8dbde=1=533f7f17-d75e-4aff- >> a064-c679cfd0273b=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fjuhovh%2Fhip- >> dex%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FSpotHIP >> >> > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would >> > also be useful. >> >> AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the >> following implementations: >> >> 1. OpenHIP >> 2. HIP for Linux >> >> (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about >> this) > ___ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec ___ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Gonzalo This is indeed a good catch about DEX, the protocol has probably changed a lot since then. So, perhaps mentioning the 2 repos (not the paper) in the write-up BUT WITH the last commit year; this is also a useful piece of information when evaluating a protocol (not saying a positive piece though ☹ ...). As you are the doc shephers, it is really up to you to decide of course Regards -éric -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Camarillo Date: Tuesday, 22 September 2020 at 12:05 To: Eric Vyncke , Miika Komu , "hipsec@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations Hi Eric, your email below arrived during my summer vacation. I am catching up on stuff now. Please, note that the 3 links provided below point to a paper from 2013, to a repo where the last commit is from 2011, and to a repo where the last commit was performed 10 years ago. Are you sure you want that type of completely out-of-date information in the writeup? Cheers, Gonzalo > -Original Message- > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 16:18 > To: Miika Komu ; hipsec@ietf.org > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations > > Thank you Miika for these pieces of information. > > Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind > updating the write-up with this list of implementations? > > For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP- > NAT document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we > need to get DEX through > > -éric > > -Original Message- > From: Miika Komu > Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50 > To: Eric Vyncke , "hipsec@ietf.org" > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations > > Hi Eric, > > ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti: > > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents] > > > > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be > > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX. > > sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of > three implementations (no idea about interoperability): > > 1. Contiki-based implementation > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_- > _A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things > > 2. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9d0fb0d6-c3af5042- > 9d0ff04d-86d2114eab2f-a5a60a52da996ac0=1=533f7f17-d75e-4aff- > a064- > c679cfd0273b=https%3A%2F%2Fcode.google.com%2Farchive%2Fp%2Fhip- > dex%2F > > 3. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5c05a7d-ab60bae9- > f5c01ae6-86d2114eab2f-d4d4be7ca0b8dbde=1=533f7f17-d75e-4aff- > a064-c679cfd0273b=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fjuhovh%2Fhip- > dex%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FSpotHIP > > > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would > > also be useful. > > AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the > following implementations: > > 1. OpenHIP > 2. HIP for Linux > > (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about > this) ___ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Hi Eric, your email below arrived during my summer vacation. I am catching up on stuff now. Please, note that the 3 links provided below point to a paper from 2013, to a repo where the last commit is from 2011, and to a repo where the last commit was performed 10 years ago. Are you sure you want that type of completely out-of-date information in the writeup? Cheers, Gonzalo > -Original Message- > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 16:18 > To: Miika Komu ; hipsec@ietf.org > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations > > Thank you Miika for these pieces of information. > > Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind > updating the write-up with this list of implementations? > > For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP- > NAT document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we > need to get DEX through > > -éric > > -Original Message- > From: Miika Komu > Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50 > To: Eric Vyncke , "hipsec@ietf.org" > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo > Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations > > Hi Eric, > > ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti: > > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents] > > > > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be > > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX. > > sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of > three implementations (no idea about interoperability): > > 1. Contiki-based implementation > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_- > _A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things > > 2. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9d0fb0d6-c3af5042- > 9d0ff04d-86d2114eab2f-a5a60a52da996ac0=1=533f7f17-d75e-4aff- > a064- > c679cfd0273b=https%3A%2F%2Fcode.google.com%2Farchive%2Fp%2Fhip- > dex%2F > > 3. Java: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5c05a7d-ab60bae9- > f5c01ae6-86d2114eab2f-d4d4be7ca0b8dbde=1=533f7f17-d75e-4aff- > a064-c679cfd0273b=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fjuhovh%2Fhip- > dex%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2FSpotHIP > > > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would > > also be useful. > > AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the > following implementations: > > 1. OpenHIP > 2. HIP for Linux > > (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about > this) ___ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Hi Eric, ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti: > [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents] > > In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be > useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX. sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of three implementations (no idea about interoperability): 1. Contiki-based implementation https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_-_A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things 2. Java: https://code.google.com/archive/p/hip-dex/ 3. Java: https://github.com/juhovh/hip-dex/tree/master/SpotHIP > In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would > also be useful. AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the following implementations: 1. OpenHIP 2. HIP for Linux (Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about this) ___ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
