[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Cooper, Brian
Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.   
  

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor 
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Children's Hospital Los Angeles 
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 
bcoo...@chla.usc.edu 


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer...

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go!

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center
12221 North Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas  78758
(512)901-1220

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, 
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
or legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original 
message.  

-


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Marcum, Pamela A
We love our Dako Artisan stainers and would not take the other brand back for 
any reason.  The techs love the ease of use and the pathologist love the 
stains.  What more could you ask!!  

Pam Marcum

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:33 PM
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.   
  

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu 


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer...

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go!

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center
12221 North Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas  78758
(512)901-1220

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original 
message.  

-


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Morken, Timothy
Brian wrote: ... one more thing.  The reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is 
about twice what it is on a Benchmark.

Are the TAT's equal? When we loaded up our old artisan with slides (50) and 
full of reagents it took over 5 hours to finish - way past our deadline. So 
nobody wanted to use it that way so the techs resisted and wanted to do manual 
to get the slide out. We ended up putting only a few stains on it.

We  are looking at doing specials the way we do immunos - on demand all day 
rather than in one batch in the AM. 

It seemed to me that the 20-slide units from Ventana allow small batches and 
run in parallel or allow staggered use. Buying a 50-slide capacity instrument 
and then putting only 20 slides at a time on it seems odd somehow.


We looking at each of these as well and not sure yet which would serve us 
better. We do about 60-80 specials slides per day, and 13 stains give us 90% of 
our volume. 

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies
UC San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, CA

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, 
proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or 
its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
message.


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:33 AM
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.   
  

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu 


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer...

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go!

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center
12221 North Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas  78758
(512)901-1220

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original 
message.  

-


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Weems, Joyce K.
I highly recommend the Leica Bond III. Company is excellent to work with and 
reagent rental a perfect solution to no capital. On line retrieval - 3 trays of 
10 slides each that can be started as needed.

Joyce Weems
Pathology Manager
678-843-7376 Phone
678-843-7831 Fax
joyce.we...@emoryhealthcare.org



www.saintjosephsatlanta.org
5665 Peachtree Dunwoody Road
Atlanta, GA 30342

This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Saint Joseph's 
Hospital and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  It may 
contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender 
regarding the error in a separate email.


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Morken, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:58 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Brian wrote: ... one more thing.  The reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is 
about twice what it is on a Benchmark.

Are the TAT's equal? When we loaded up our old artisan with slides (50) and 
full of reagents it took over 5 hours to finish - way past our deadline. So 
nobody wanted to use it that way so the techs resisted and wanted to do manual 
to get the slide out. We ended up putting only a few stains on it.

We  are looking at doing specials the way we do immunos - on demand all day 
rather than in one batch in the AM.

It seemed to me that the 20-slide units from Ventana allow small batches and 
run in parallel or allow staggered use. Buying a 50-slide capacity instrument 
and then putting only 20 slides at a time on it seems odd somehow.


We looking at each of these as well and not sure yet which would serve us 
better. We do about 60-80 specials slides per day, and 13 stains give us 90% of 
our volume.

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies UC 
San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco, CA

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, 
proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or 
its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
message.


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:33 AM
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer...

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go!

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center
12221 North Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas  78758
(512)901-1220

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies

Re: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Pam Marcum
I understand the problem.  We have two Artisans and rarely have a time issue.  

- Original Message -

From: Timothy Morken timothy.mor...@ucsfmedctr.org 
To: Histonet histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:58:02 PM 
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer... 

Brian wrote: ... one more thing.  The reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is 
about twice what it is on a Benchmark. 

Are the TAT's equal? When we loaded up our old artisan with slides (50) and 
full of reagents it took over 5 hours to finish - way past our deadline. So 
nobody wanted to use it that way so the techs resisted and wanted to do manual 
to get the slide out. We ended up putting only a few stains on it. 

We  are looking at doing specials the way we do immunos - on demand all day 
rather than in one batch in the AM. 

It seemed to me that the 20-slide units from Ventana allow small batches and 
run in parallel or allow staggered use. Buying a 50-slide capacity instrument 
and then putting only 20 slides at a time on it seems odd somehow. 


We looking at each of these as well and not sure yet which would serve us 
better. We do about 60-80 specials slides per day, and 13 stains give us 90% of 
our volume. 

Tim Morken 
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies 
UC San Francisco Medical Center 
San Francisco, CA 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, 
proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or 
its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
message. 


-Original Message- 
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:33 AM 
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer... 

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.       
  

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles 
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu 


-Original Message- 
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM 
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer... 

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go! 

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center 
12221 North Mopac Expressway 
Austin, Texas  78758 
(512)901-1220 

___ 
Histonet mailing list 
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet 



- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original 
message.   

- 


___ 
Histonet mailing list 
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet 

___ 
Histonet mailing list 
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Sebree Linda A
We've had VMS instruments from day 1 and currently have 4 Ultras.  The random 
access capability is awesome and we can even get out EBER ISH slides the same 
day if put on in the morning.  Our HER2 dual ISH stains run overnight as they 
are 14 hour protocols.  Reproducibility among the 4 instruments and 
concurrent/consecutive stains on the same instrument are a given.  Technical 
advice and service are outstanding.  And, no, I do not have a stake in the 
company just am really sold by their products.


Linda A. Sebree

From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] on behalf of Morken, Timothy 
[timothy.mor...@ucsfmedctr.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:58 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Brian wrote: ... one more thing.  The reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is 
about twice what it is on a Benchmark.

Are the TAT's equal? When we loaded up our old artisan with slides (50) and 
full of reagents it took over 5 hours to finish - way past our deadline. So 
nobody wanted to use it that way so the techs resisted and wanted to do manual 
to get the slide out. We ended up putting only a few stains on it.

We  are looking at doing specials the way we do immunos - on demand all day 
rather than in one batch in the AM.

It seemed to me that the 20-slide units from Ventana allow small batches and 
run in parallel or allow staggered use. Buying a 50-slide capacity instrument 
and then putting only 20 slides at a time on it seems odd somehow.


We looking at each of these as well and not sure yet which would serve us 
better. We do about 60-80 specials slides per day, and 13 stains give us 90% of 
our volume.

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies
UC San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, CA

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, 
proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or 
its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
message.


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:33 AM
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer...

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go!

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center
12221 North Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas  78758
(512)901-1220

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original 
message.

-


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman

[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Cooper, Brian
I guess TAT's being equal is a relative term, depending upon your workload.  
For our purposes, it's not slide capacity that poses a problem--it's reagent 
capacity.  We've never loaded 50 special stains at any one time--we typically 
don't even have half that amount in one day!  

So here's a scenario common to the workload at our institution.  For our liver 
panels, we run Iron, Trichrome, Retic, PAS with and without Digestion.  That 
pretty much maxes out the reagent capacity on the Benchmark.  Sure, we can load 
up to 20 of these onto the Benchmark.  But as is so frequently the case, we 
also have just 1 GMS that also needs to be stained!  This is where the second 
Benchmark comes into play, or we'll have to stain by hand.   One Artisan can 
handle this at the same time, and if memory serves (disclosure--it's been about 
2 years, and the model I used didn't have online deparaffinization), it didn't 
add all that much time to the process.  It was certainly faster than waiting 
for the machine to complete, and start another run.   For our institution, it's 
either going to be 2 Artisans or 2 Benchmarks.  The Artisans will give us some 
greater flexibility due to the greater reagent capacity.  

Brian


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Morken, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:58 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Brian wrote: ... one more thing.  The reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is 
about twice what it is on a Benchmark.

Are the TAT's equal? When we loaded up our old artisan with slides (50) and 
full of reagents it took over 5 hours to finish - way past our deadline. So 
nobody wanted to use it that way so the techs resisted and wanted to do manual 
to get the slide out. We ended up putting only a few stains on it.

We  are looking at doing specials the way we do immunos - on demand all day 
rather than in one batch in the AM. 

It seemed to me that the 20-slide units from Ventana allow small batches and 
run in parallel or allow staggered use. Buying a 50-slide capacity instrument 
and then putting only 20 slides at a time on it seems odd somehow.


We looking at each of these as well and not sure yet which would serve us 
better. We do about 60-80 specials slides per day, and 13 stains give us 90% of 
our volume. 

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies UC 
San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco, CA

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, 
proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or 
its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
message.


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:33 AM
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.   
  

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu 


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer...

Opinions on Ventana versus Dako...Go!

Sarah E. Dysart, BA, HT (ASCP), QIHC (ASCP) Pathology Supervisor St. David's 
North Austin Medical Center
12221 North Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas  78758
(512)901-1220

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

[Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

2014-09-17 Thread Sebree Linda A
Sorry, I thought we were talking IHC/ISH not SS.

Linda A. Sebree

From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] on behalf of Cooper, Brian 
[bcoo...@chla.usc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:36 PM
To: Morken, Timothy; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

I guess TAT's being equal is a relative term, depending upon your workload.  
For our purposes, it's not slide capacity that poses a problem--it's reagent 
capacity.  We've never loaded 50 special stains at any one time--we typically 
don't even have half that amount in one day!

So here's a scenario common to the workload at our institution.  For our liver 
panels, we run Iron, Trichrome, Retic, PAS with and without Digestion.  That 
pretty much maxes out the reagent capacity on the Benchmark.  Sure, we can load 
up to 20 of these onto the Benchmark.  But as is so frequently the case, we 
also have just 1 GMS that also needs to be stained!  This is where the second 
Benchmark comes into play, or we'll have to stain by hand.   One Artisan can 
handle this at the same time, and if memory serves (disclosure--it's been about 
2 years, and the model I used didn't have online deparaffinization), it didn't 
add all that much time to the process.  It was certainly faster than waiting 
for the machine to complete, and start another run.   For our institution, it's 
either going to be 2 Artisans or 2 Benchmarks.  The Artisans will give us some 
greater flexibility due to the greater reagent capacity.

Brian


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Morken, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:58 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Brian wrote: ... one more thing.  The reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is 
about twice what it is on a Benchmark.

Are the TAT's equal? When we loaded up our old artisan with slides (50) and 
full of reagents it took over 5 hours to finish - way past our deadline. So 
nobody wanted to use it that way so the techs resisted and wanted to do manual 
to get the slide out. We ended up putting only a few stains on it.

We  are looking at doing specials the way we do immunos - on demand all day 
rather than in one batch in the AM.

It seemed to me that the 20-slide units from Ventana allow small batches and 
run in parallel or allow staggered use. Buying a 50-slide capacity instrument 
and then putting only 20 slides at a time on it seems odd somehow.


We looking at each of these as well and not sure yet which would serve us 
better. We do about 60-80 specials slides per day, and 13 stains give us 90% of 
our volume.

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies UC 
San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco, CA

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, 
proprietary, and/or privileged information protected by law. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not use, copy, or distribute this email message or 
its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error, 
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original 
message.


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cooper, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:33 AM
To: sarah.dys...@stdavids.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Automated Special Stainer...

Dako Artisan all the way!   I've used both systems (the Artisan in my old 
institution).  We currently have a few of the new Benchmarks on demo right now. 
 Thus far, we're not that impressed.  Frequently, there's variability on the 
silver stains (even in the same run,) and adjusting timing is nowhere near as 
flexible as on the Artisan.  Even if you take away the half hour for online 
deparaffinization, the stains take significantly longer on the Benchmarks (than 
the old Nexes we are still running in our lab).   Oh yeah, one more thing.  The 
reagent tray capacity on the Artisan is about twice what it is on a Benchmark.  
You'll need two Benchmarks to do what one Artisan does, TATs being equal.

Brian D. Cooper, HT (ASCP)CM | Histology Supervisor Department of Pathology and 
Laboratory Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles
4650 Sunset Blvd MS#43- Los Angeles, CA 90027 bcoo...@chla.usc.edu


-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of 
sarah.dys...@stdavids.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:13 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Automated Special Stainer