cht-
Von: Blazek, Linda [mailto:lbla...@digestivespecialists.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 14:38
An: Gudrun Lang
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Betreff: RE: [Histonet] Quality Measure for Pathology
Gudrun,
Our lab is 95% biopsy specimens. Therefor the number of pieces counted at
gross i
gliche Nachricht-
Von: Blazek, Linda [mailto:lbla...@digestivespecialists.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 14:38
An: Gudrun Lang
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Betreff: RE: [Histonet] Quality Measure for Pathology
Gudrun,
Our lab is 95% biopsy specimens. Therefor the number of pieces
, but things that can be caught
at the bench.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Garrey Faller via Histonet
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 5:36 AM
To: Normington Lacy
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Quality Measure for Pathology
Good ideas. I would get the pathologist
Betreff: Re: [Histonet] Quality Measure for Pathology
Also a discrepancy between the number of pieces that are dictated at gross as
being in a cassette compared to what is found in the
cassette at embedding. You can record the number of blocks that need
re-embedded and the number of slide recuts
Good ideas. I would get the pathologist(s) involved. Having just one monitor in
my opinion would not fly in my book.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:33 AM, Normington Lacy via Histonet
> wrote:
>
> Some ideas:
>
> Proficiency Testing
> Corrected Results (Addendums/Amendment)
@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2018 18:55
An: Normington Lacy; Amy Self
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Betreff: Re: [Histonet] Quality Measure for Pathology
Also a discrepancy between the number of pieces that are dictated at gross as
being in a cassette compared to what is found
Amy Self, Histology Lab Senior Tech at Tidelands Georgetown Memorial
Hospital in Georgetown SC asks:
>>I am looking for ideas/suggestions for QM Histology/Pathology. My QM
director wants me to "measure" something that I can place on the lab
dashboard.<<
Look at the August 2017 number of CAP
@lists.utsouthwestern.edu'
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Quality Measure for Pathology
Some ideas:
Proficiency Testing
Corrected Results (Addendums/Amendment) volume
Turnaround Time Monitoring
Frozen Section TAT (critical call)
Rejected Tests (empty bottles, etc)
-Original Message-
From: Amy
Some ideas:
Proficiency Testing
Corrected Results (Addendums/Amendment) volume
Turnaround Time Monitoring
Frozen Section TAT (critical call)
Rejected Tests (empty bottles, etc)
-Original Message-
From: Amy Self via Histonet [mailto:histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June
