*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~* { Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net - http://www.hizbi.net } { Hantarkan mesej anda ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] } { Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] } *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~* PAS : KE ARAH PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM YANG ADIL ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Assalamualaikum, Untuk bahan bacaan. Haris petik daripada diskusi COMPUTERGUYS. COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest - 20 Mar 2001 to 21 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-118) Wassalam. : ) -- Subject: FWD: NSF study: "Internet Voting is no 'Magic Ballot'": [risks] Risks Digest 21.28 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:20:25 -0500 From: David Chessler <chessler@> * Original: FROM..... Dave Farber Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:24:58 -0800 (PST) From: Terry Carroll Subject: NSF study: "Internet Voting is no 'Magic Ballot'" RISKS has previously had discussions of the risks associated with going to computerized voting (especially Internet-based voting) as an attempted panacea for the types of problems we saw in the last US presidential election. The National Science Foundation recently released a study that it commissioned from the Internet Policy Institute on problems associated with Internet voting. The NSF's press release on the study may be found at <http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/press/01/pr0118.htm>. The IPI has a page devoted to the study (including a link to the report itself) at <http://www.internetpolicy.org/research/results.html>. The NSF highlights the following findings with respect to the feasibility of Internet voting: - Poll site Internet voting systems offer some benefits and could be responsibly deployed within the next several election cycles; - The next step beyond poll-site voting would be to deploy kiosk voting terminals in non-traditional public voting sites; - Remote Internet voting systems pose significant risk and should not be used in public elections until substantial technical and social science issues are addressed; and - Internet-based voter registration poses significant risk to the integrity of the voting process, and should not be implemented for the foreseeable future. Terry Carroll, Santa Clara, CA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [These results are rather similar to the findings of the California commission. Interested readers should also dig up the recent Caltech/MIT report, which states that lever machines, hand-counted paper ballots, and optically scanned ballots are all significantly more accurate than direct-recording voting machines (DREs) and Internet voting schemes. PGN] For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/ -- - http://hafnie.terrashare.com/ Bantuan Komputer Internet Melalui Email Email kosong kepada [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB) ( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body: UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB) ( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan ) ( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net ) ( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pengirim: "Harisfazillah Jamel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>