|
I will not cling to any party position if the party
leadership or rank-and-file agrees with Fan Yew Teng that I should retire from
politics
Media Statement by Lim Kit Siang (Petaling Jaya, Wednesday): I respect the views of the Perak DAP Deputy Chairman, Sdr. Fan Yew Teng, that Karpal and I should resign from our posts following the party’s humiliating defeat in the general election. He said that both of us were among the strongest
advocates in the party for the pact with PAS under the Barisan Alternatif and
that what we did was wrong as it was
a big mistake by joining Barisan Alternatif. He said that it was clear that the pact with PAS
had hurt the DAP and that if not for the pact, the DAP would have captured many
seats.
Let me state at the outset that I will not cling to
any party position if the party leadership or rank-and-file agrees with Fan that
I should retire from politics. I have no
doubt that Karpal takes the same position. I confirm that Fan had twice advocated at
party brain-storming sessions that the DAP break with PAS and pull out of
the Barisan Alternatif.
I myself had repeatedly warned that DAP’s
co-operation with PAS in the Barisan Alternatif posed great risks for the DAP
although I advocated it.
As I said at the final DAP General Election
National Conference on 14th November 1999 (where Fan did not repeat his call for
the DAP’s pull-out of the Barisan
Alternatif), DAP could either win an unprecedented victory in the party’s history or suffer unprecedented defeat as a result of our teaming up with PAS, KeADILan and PRM to form the Barisan Alternative. I had said at the time that fighting on our own,
the DAP could look forward to winning 20 to 25 parliamentary seats. In
teaming up with PAS, KeADILan and PRM
to form Barisan Alternatif, assuming the best results, the DAP could look forward to 30 to 35 seats. I asked whether it was worthwhile hoping to
win an extra five to ten parliamentary seats in the Barisan Alternatif when the
risks were so high that the DAP might
suffer unprecedented defeat - not because it was an opportunistic and indefensible alliance, but because it gave the Barisan Nasional with its virtual monopoly of the 3Ms of money, media and government machinery the opportunity to confuse, mislead and scare the voters about the real issues at stake in the next general election. This is what I said:
"If the DAP is thinking
soley in selfish party terms, the risks are too great and it is definitely not
worth it.
However, if we believe that the present election provides the golden historic opportunity to break the political hegemony of the Barisan Nasional by ending its two-thirds parliamentary majority, then the risks are worth taking for the restoration of justice and democracy, as well as for the future of the people and nation. "If the DAP suffers
unprecedented defeat in the next general election because the DAP is unable to
counter and defuse
the Barisan Nasional’s four trump-cards to confuse and mislead the voters, it will be a tragedy for the DAP. But it will be a greater tragedy for Malaysia if the hopes of Malaysians that the new millennium will usher in a new era for justice and democracy is crushed even before the new millennium has started in a month’s time!" I stand by these words. I believe that the
political decision taken by the DAP to co-operate with the PAS, KeADILan and PRM
in Barisan Alternatif to smash the
Barisan Nasional political hegemony and two-thirds majority to break the four-decade mould of Malaysian politics of "divide and rule" along racial and religious lines was the right and correct one. This was because no opposition party, whether DAP,
PAS or KeADILan on its own could smash the Barisan Nasional political hegemony
by breaking its two-thirds
parliamentary majority - but collectively, the Barisan Alternatif stands a chance of achieving this political breakthrough by securing 70 to 75 parliamentary seats. The decision to co-operate with PAS in the
Barisan Alternatif on the common manifesto "Towards A Just Malaysia" was
taken not only by the DAP Central
Executive Committee after numerous meetings and discussions but also by the DAP National Congress, which adopted an unanimous resolution in Kuala Lumpur on 9th September 1999 "endorsing the co-operation of DAP with other opposition parties to break the Barisan Nasional political hegemony to restore justice, freedom, democracy and good governance". Fan also attended the Party National Congress in
Kuala Lumpur in September this year and voted for the resolution.
Despite the catastrophic defeat suffered by the DAP
in the Nov. 29 election, I believe that the DAP decision to work with PAS in the
Barisan Alternatif was the
correct, proper, honourable and noble one - taking high calculated political risks where the DAP might lose big in the hope of seizing the golden political opportunity of breaking the Barisan Nasional political hegemony and two-third majority. One reason I moved from Tanjong to Bukit Bendera
was to send out the message that for the sake of justice and democracy in
Malaysia, it was not only the DAP
which was taking high calculated political risk, as DAP Secretary-General I was prepared to personally take such high calculated political risks myself in the hope that it could help in providing the national momentum to achieve a political breakthrough for democracy and Malaysia on the eve of the new millennium. It was not to be, but I do not think the DAP should
wallow in regrets and self-pity. We have proved that just as in the past
33 years, DAP leaders were prepared to
make great personal sacrifices for the party cause for an united, just, democratic and prosperous Malaysia, we have proved to Malaysians that DAP as a political party is neither selfish nor greedy but is prepared to make sacrifices for a new Malaysia in the new millennium where politics would be less dominated by race and religion but revolve around the issues of justice, freedom, democracy and good governance. Unless the DAP decision to co-operate with PAS in
the Barisan Alternatif in the last general election was wrong and a great
political blunder, or had dishonourable
intentions as to secretly support the Islamic state objective of PAS, this is not the time for division inside the party. The question is where the DAP goes from here.
There have been mounting pressure from inside and outside the party that the DAP
should sever co-operation with
PAS. But there are also widespread concerns that DAP might withdraw from the Barisan Alternatif. The avalanche of emails which the party had
received since the Nov. 29 polls reflect both views.
This is one email I received on 1st December
1999:
"I am a 36-year-old
muslim malay lady living in Selangor. I’ve read in the newspaper that DAP
would probably opt out
of BA coalition in the next general election. Why? Do you know that there are many of the malays beginning to understand what DAP is all about specially among the younger generation? "Remember that this
younger generation will be the next set of leaders and they can make the
difference. If DAP were
to leave BA, then DAP has disillusioned us. Please don’t leave. "DAP should first get
itself organised. Then, keep on explaining to the older generation of the
malay community that
DAP is not what BN makes it out to be. "The struggle doesn’t stop
here. Ever since DAP has decided to join the coalition, many of us have begun to
admire the
views of some of the DAP leaders and the frankness that they exhibit. At least, we know where you stand unlike the MIC, MCA and Gerakan which are pretentious. "Please don’t leave those
who have worked so hard for the election. Keep their spirits up. With DAP
leaving BA, then
that will be a blow to some of them. They need your words of support, appreciation, and encouragement. Prove to them that DAP leaders are not losers." If we sincerely believe that the DAP's co-operation
with PAS, KeADILan and PRM was to seize the historic opportunity to smash the
Barisan Nasional political
hegemony and two-thirds majority, break the mould of Malaysian politics based on racial and religious "divide and rule" and usher in a new politics grounded on the Barisan Alternative's common manifesto "Towards A Just Malaysia", we should persevere in our pioneering political efforts unless PAS makes such an opposition co-operation completely untenable because of disrespect and insensitivities of the PAS state governments of Kelantan and Trengganu to the rights and sensitivities of the diverse races and religions in Malaysia and refusal to honour both the spirit and letter of the Barisan Alternative common manifesto. These are very difficult and challenging
times. DAP must persist in our great struggle for justice, freedom,
democracy and good governance. We welcome
comments, advice, suggestions and criticisms from Malaysians as to how the Party can continue to play an important role in this political struggle. However, we are also aware that there are
detractors as well as "political vultures" who wish to exploit the
party’s catastrophic defeat in the Nov. 29 general
election to their advantage - many of whom have come out of their woodworks in the past week. Some of them are trying to sow distrust or
give the party a bad public image by concocting lies and falsehoods. One
such line is to allege that the DAP Candidate
Selection Committee had discriminated against experienced and senior party leaders like Fan Yew Teng by not offering him a parliamentary seat. In actual fact, Fan was initially offered the
Kampar parliamentary seat which he declined on health grounds. However, he
was later persuaded to contest for a Perak
state assembly seat and stood in Tebing Tinggi, regarded as one of the best DAP state seats in the Kinta Valley. Unfortunately, Fan lost by 1,441 votes. (8/12/99)
*Lim Kit Siang - DAP National Chairman
|
