H-Net* hussin abdaziz wanted you to read this:

2003-03-29 Terurut Topik hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com

 *~*
 {  Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net -  http://www.hizbi.net }
 {Hantarkan mesej anda ke:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 {Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 *~*
 UNDILAH PAS DAN BARISAN ALTERNATIF
 ~~~
As Salamu alaikum,
La\'anatullahi alal amerika wal yahud... mampus amerika!

Jubilation turns to hate as aid arrives (27 Mar 2003)

The young man wearing the brown shawl summed it up succinctly: "We want you to go back 
home. We do not want your American and British aid," he said, his eyes flashing with 
anger. 
If the British humanitarian taskforce had any doubts as to the legitimacy of his 
claims, the sudden burst of gunfire from a nearby building left no one in any doubt. 

The first attempt to deliver aid to the Iraqi people was, in all respects, a practical 
and logistical disaster. A convoy of vehicles, including two water tankers and as many 
Warrior armoured vehicles, had set off from the abandoned Shaiba airfield earlier. The 
intent was to deliver food and water to win over the hearts and minds of the 
beleaguered Iraqis. 

As the convoy pulled up inside the town, however, a crowd of predominantly young men 
ran towards it. Fights and skirmishes broke out for bottles of water. Iraqis asked for 
food and cigarettes. And while a cordon was quickly created, hundreds rushed towards 
the trucks, overpowering the soldiers. 

"We have had no water and no food," said Ali Abdullah, 50. He stood away from the 
crowd, stroking his beard and surveyed the scene intently as crowds of young men 
fought over the water. 

"For five days now, we have been without electricity. Have you brought some 
electricity?" 

The exercise had been beset with a number of difficulties from the outset. On leaving 
the nearby Shaiba airfield - a series of abandoned hangars, runways and outbuildings 
on the road to Basra - there had been innumerable delays as reports of violence 
filtered back from Zubayr. Earlier, there had been a delay in confirming security in 
the town. 

Inside Zubayr, however, the distribution initially began with good nature. Young men 
joked with each other, smiled and passed around bottles of water. Within 10 minutes, 
however, an undercurrent of resentment flowed to the surface. The war, the bombing, 
sanctions and their cumulative toll all boiled over. 

Jalil Ali, 25, the young Iraqi in the brown shawl, asked if any of the humanitarian 
aid was being provided by Americans. 

"Take it back," he yelled, pretending to push it away. "We want the Americans to go 
back home. We do not need them here. Go back home. I do not need this." 

Around him, his friends giggled. Not far away, people rushed out of earthen buildings 
and raced down a dual carriageway. Ali, however, seemed to realise the irony only too 
well. "They bomb. And now they want to give water and food. How can they do both? 
How?" It was then that the gunfire erupted. 

Earlier, the soldiers had been optimistic but pensive. After enduring a rainy and 
windy night in the disused hangar at the Shaiba airfield, the convoy had been well 
intentioned. It was a curious sight: a line of trucks bearing much-needed humani 
tarian aid - aid that betrayed all the hallmarks of an occupying force, but aid none 
the less. The Iraqis, while initially jubilant, were quickly sceptical. 

"I need electricity," said Moyed Abdullah, 33. "I need to power my house. See the 
electricity lines? They are not working; they have not been working for days. Do you 
bring any electricity?" 

Around him, British and US soldiers struggled to control the crowds. Time and again, 
the Iraqis were pushed back - always, they seemed to slip in under the makeshift 
rope-line. After a while, it seemed, it was better simply to stand back and wait for 
the inevitable to happen. 

The burst of gunfire from across the road finally stopped all attempts to supply the 
aid. As soldiers leapt into the jeeps, a Warrior turned round and took out the 
position the gunfire had come from. And with daylight fast fading, the humanitarian 
taskforce decided to speed back to its base at Shaibah airfield. 

Tomorrow, they will undoubtedly try again to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi 
civilians. And presumably tomorrow, they will encounter yet more resentment. 




Guardian



Please visit the following islamic websites:

http://www.al-aqsa.org ( English, Arabic )

http://www.explizit-islam.de ( Deutsch )

http://www.hilafet.com ( Turkish )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, German )

http://www.ramadhan.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic )

http://www.al-islam.or.id ( Indonesian )

http://www.expliciet.nl ( Dutch )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.dk ( Danish )

http://www.khilafah.com ( English, Urdu )

http://www.khilafah.net ( Arabic )

http://www.khilafa

H-Net* hussin abdaziz wanted you to read this:

2003-03-29 Terurut Topik hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com

 *~*
 {  Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net -  http://www.hizbi.net }
 {Hantarkan mesej anda ke:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 {Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 *~*
 UNDILAH PAS DAN BARISAN ALTERNATIF
 ~~~
As Salamu alaikum,
La\'anatullahi amerika wal yahud

US Resorts To Theft: Banks Ordered To Transfer $1.74 B Iraqi Funds To US (27 Mar 2003)

Switzerland's leading financial institution UBS will comply with an American request 
to transfer million-dollar Iraqi funds, frozen under the UN sanctions imposed after 
the 1991 Gulf War, to a US treasury fund. The bank spokesperson who confirmed the 
decision refrained from specifying the exact sum involved.

Last week, the US Treasury Department ordered 17 of the world's largest financial 
institutions, both in the United States and abroad, to transfer the frozen Iraqi 
assets to an account in New York’s Federal Reserve Bank.

The Bush administration has pledged to dedicate most of the $1.74 billion confiscated 
from frozen Iraqi deposits in various international accounts to
the reconstruction of post-war Iraq and to humanitarian aid to the beleaguered nation. 
Al Bawaba



Please visit the following islamic websites:

http://www.al-aqsa.org ( English, Arabic )

http://www.explizit-islam.de ( Deutsch )

http://www.hilafet.com ( Turkish )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, German )

http://www.ramadhan.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic )

http://www.al-islam.or.id ( Indonesian )

http://www.expliciet.nl ( Dutch )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.dk ( Danish )

http://www.khilafah.com ( English, Urdu )

http://www.khilafah.net ( Arabic )

http://www.khilafah.org ( English )

 
 ( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
 ( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  pada body:  UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
 ( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
 ( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net  )
 ( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 

Pengirim: "hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


H-Net* hussin abdaziz wanted you to read this:

2003-03-29 Terurut Topik hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com

 *~*
 {  Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net -  http://www.hizbi.net }
 {Hantarkan mesej anda ke:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 {Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 *~*
 UNDILAH PAS DAN BARISAN ALTERNATIF
 ~~~
As Salamu alaikum,
before this \"they\" destroyed one surau in bangi, malaysia - an umno version 
\"Islamic country\"... 

Israeli bulldozers demolish mosque in Rafah (28 Mar 2003)

Israeli army bulldozers on Thursday demolished a mosque in Rafah at the southern tip 
of the Gaza Strip,  Palestinian sources said.  
   
The sources said Israeli bulldozers demolished 'Masjid al Nur'
(al-Nur Mosque) in southern Rafah in early morning hours Thursday  without any 
explanation.  
The Israeli army said nothing about the destruction of the mosque,
with one Israeli spokesman saying he had no knowledge of this 
''incident.'' Ever since the beginning of the Palestinian uprising
against the Israeli apartheid regime, Israeli occupation troops has   destroyed and 
desecrated a number of mosques and inflicted damage on a
number of churches.   
The destruction of the places of worship was apparently part of  the Israeli plan 
to destroy as many buildings as possible in Occupied Palestine for the purpose of 
driving Palestinians to leave their   homeland. 




IRNA



Please visit the following islamic websites:

http://www.al-aqsa.org ( English, Arabic )

http://www.explizit-islam.de ( Deutsch )

http://www.hilafet.com ( Turkish )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, German )

http://www.ramadhan.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic )

http://www.al-islam.or.id ( Indonesian )

http://www.expliciet.nl ( Dutch )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.dk ( Danish )

http://www.khilafah.com ( English, Urdu )

http://www.khilafah.net ( Arabic )

http://www.khilafah.org ( English )

 
 ( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
 ( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  pada body:  UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
 ( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
 ( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net  )
 ( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 

Pengirim: "hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


H-Net* hussin abdaziz wanted you to read this:

2003-03-29 Terurut Topik hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com

 *~*
 {  Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net -  http://www.hizbi.net }
 {Hantarkan mesej anda ke:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 {Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 *~*
 UNDILAH PAS DAN BARISAN ALTERNATIF
 ~~~
As Salamu alaikum,

Malaysia too...

"if free elections were held, every single Arab country ...would produce an Islamist 
government that would kick the Americans out" (28 Mar 2003)

"I believe 100 percent that if free elections were held, every single Arab country -- 
with the possible exception of Lebanon -- would produce an Islamist government that 
would kick the Americans out. ... Talking about democracy is utter hypocrisy. (The 
Americans) have no intention of doing it." Eric Margolis   

 Voices of Dissent: Eric Margolis   

The United States will be bogged down in a protracted guerrilla war in Iraq even after 
Saddam Hussein is killed or captured, an analyst with 25 years' experience in covering 
the Middle East predicted. 

"I believe there still will be resistance," Eric Margolis, foreign affairs columnist 
for the Toronto Sun, said in a telephone interview. "The Iraqis consider themselves 
the leaders of the Arab world. They're sending a message to the Arabs. There will be 
violence of some kind." 

Margolis drew a parallel with Afghanistan. 

There, he said, the United States has "overthrown the government" and "put the Afghan 
communists back in power in the north, and it's got (Hamid) Karzai as kind of a puppet 
ruler in Kabul protected by foreign troops. But the rest of the country is in chaos. 

"I see this as probably what will happen in Iraq. The U.S. will find some general or 
smooth-spoken person to put in charge in Baghdad with an American garrison, but the 
rest of the country will be sort of like a free-fire zone with the Kurds feuding up in 
the north and possible Turkish intervention, and chaos in the south. 

"I think Iraq will just be Afghanistan by a factor of 10. I don't see any way the 
Americans are going to pull out of Iraq, because I don't see who they're going to 
convince to come and act as a police force, particularly now after there have been 
such bad relations with the U.N. The Americans will have to keep the country together, 
or it will disintegrate on its own. 

"My feeling is that America is sticking its head in a hornet's nest and is going to be 
stuck just like in Afghanistan. We (Margolis is American) have 10,000 troops there, 
and if they pull them out the Taliban will come back. They are there (at a cost of) 
$1.3 billion a month forever, as far as we can see." 

Margolis said the United States would be faced with a low-grade guerrilla war to 
protect oil exports. 

"The pipelines go to the pumping stations, and those are prime targets for any kind of 
guerrilla attack," he said. "And the U.S. wants to finance its occupation of Iraq by 
'plundering' Iraq's oil. I guess the Bush administration calls it 'liberating' the 
oil. But they've got to get the oil out. And that's not going to happen quickly, 
either, because it's estimated that $5 billion to $20 billion of refurbishing has to 
be done to bring (the pipeline) up to just 1990 standards; it's decayed so much. It's 
a very saline area there, and there's been a lot of corrosion, and they haven't had 
any spare parts. 

"So there's not going to be a flood of oil. There's going to be a very large 
investment in the oil infrastructure. And a prime guerrilla target will be the oil 
exports to undermine the American control." 

He said most "terrorist" incidents in the world today are FARC attacks on oil 
pipelines coming out of Colombia. 

It's going to be "a long civil war," he said, and "enormously expensive." 

Margolis specializes in military matters and radical Islamic groups. He is author of 
"War at the Top of the World" (2002), which is about Afghanistan, India and Pakistan. 

He said the current war was "trumped-up" and unjustified. 

Margolis said he was in Iraq in the 1980s when Saddam was an American ally, and he saw 
the United States supply Iraq with money and the precursor germs from which Iraq made 
its bioweapons. 

Asked how he knows this, he replied that the information came out in Senate hearings. 

In October it was reported that in the 1980s, when the United States supported Iraq in 
its war against Iran, Iraq ordered pathogen samples from the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention in Atlanta, saying it needed them for legitimate medical 
research. The transfers were detailed in a 1994 Senate Banking Committee report and a 
1995 follow-up letter from the CDC to the Senate. The exports were legal at the time 
and approved under a program administered by the Commerce Department. 

"But more important," Margolis said, "when I was in Baghdad in the fall of 1990, I 
uncovered a gr

H-Net* hussin abdaziz wanted you to read this:

2003-03-23 Terurut Topik hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com

 *~*
 {  Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net -  http://www.hizbi.net }
 {Hantarkan mesej anda ke:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 {Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 *~*
 UNDILAH PAS DAN BARISAN ALTERNATIF
 ~~~
As Salamu alaikum,

sharing their views...
wassalam

Hizb-ut-Tahrir hits at Iraqi conflict (23 Mar 2003)

ISLAMIC PARTY HITS AT IRAQI CONFLICT

 
Muslims in Britain were tonight urged to put pressure on the "cowardly" leaders of 
countries in the Middle East providing support for British and American troops in the 
war on Iraq.

At a hastily convened emergency seminar, representatives from the Hizb ut-Tahrir 
group, an Islamic political party, met in London to speak out against the conflict.

Dr Imran Waheed, a doctor based in Birmingham, said it was vital for Muslims to put 
pressure on those allowing the allies to use their land for military bases. 

He singled out Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The doctor also said that Pakistan and Iran were wrong to remain neutral.

"There is no time to be neutral when the people of Iraq are being killed," he said.

"Sadly, the leaders of the Muslim world are more than happy to look after the 
interests of the western nations rather than the interests of their people.

"They have no ideology and they have no values with which they want to stand up for - 
they don't even believe in nationalism."

Dr Waheed said these countries were betraying the Islamic faith by condoning the 
killing of Muslims.

Addressing the gathering in the Brondesbury Park Hotel in north London, he said the 
party believed Iraq should retain the right to own weapons of mass destruction.

He said: "We believe that the Muslim world needs these weapons as well so they can 
compete with the western world who currently have the superiority over them in terms 
of weapons."

And he said the UN weapons inspectors should have been thrown out of Iraq.

The doctor claimed that the strikes on Iraq were part of a modern colonialism by the 
allies.

"We believe military action which has been instigated by America and Britain is once 
again showing their colonialist nature," he said.

He cited the example of US troops hoisting the American flag in southern Iraq today, 
and said it was a sign of conquest.

Dr Waheed told his audience that he feared America and Britain would replace Saddam 
Hussein with a leader who had the west's best interests at heart.

"We do not want to see him replaced with an Iraqi version of Hamid Karzai."

Despite the party's strong anti-war stance, Mr Waheed was highly critical of the Iraqi 
leader.

"Saddam Hussein is a western inspired ruler.

"He gains his authority and position at the hands of the west who supported him and 
nurtured him through many years - who armed him.

"He is no friend to the Muslims, hundreds of our members have perished in his torture 
chambers for working to undermine him and the system he governs."

At tonight's seminar, Muslims were urged to stand up with their "brothers and sisters 
in Iraq".

Dr Waheed stressed that their vitriol was focused on the British and American 
governments and not the ordinary people.

"We will not be directing sentiments of anger towards the people of the west, but the 
governments of the west who are undertaking this action.

"The time is coming when the Muslims of the world are going to rise up against their 
puppet rulers, eject America and Britain from the Muslim world, and re-establish a 
global Islamic state."

Hizb ut-Tahrir has members throughout the world and saw 10,000 people attend a 
conference in London last year.
Press Association



Please visit the following islamic websites:

http://www.al-aqsa.org ( English, Arabic )

http://www.explizit-islam.de ( Deutsch )

http://www.hilafet.com ( Turkish )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic, Urdu, Russian, German )

http://www.ramadhan.org ( English, Turkish, Arabic )

http://www.al-islam.or.id ( Indonesian )

http://www.expliciet.nl ( Dutch )

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.dk ( Danish )

http://www.khilafah.com ( English, Urdu )

http://www.khilafah.net ( Arabic )

http://www.khilafah.org ( English )

 
 ( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]   pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
 ( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  pada body:  UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
 ( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
 ( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net  )
 ( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 

Pengirim: "hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


H-Net* hussin abdaziz wanted you to read this:

2003-03-23 Terurut Topik hussin abdaziz c/o www.khilafah.com

 *~*
 {  Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net -  http://www.hizbi.net }
 {Hantarkan mesej anda ke:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 {Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
 *~*
 UNDILAH PAS DAN BARISAN ALTERNATIF
 ~~~
As Salamu alaikum,

sekadar berkongsi maklumat... mudah2an memberi manfaat.
wassalam

The despicable submission of the rulers before the open American aggression (17 Feb 
2003)

ÈÓã Çááå ÇáÑÍãä ÇáÑÍíã
The despicable submission of the rulers before the open American aggression
Today we face a very grave event, where America has brought her armies to Kuwait and 
the rest of the Gulf States. She uses against the Muslims the assistance of the rulers 
of Kuwait, the rest of the Gulf, indeed all the rulers of the Muslim world. She has 
declared her task to be attacking Iraq. The pretext she gave for this is that Iraq is 
a threat to the region, her neighbours and to American interests due to her possession 
of weapons of mass destruction. She actually concealed the true aims of this action. 
Before discussing these aims, we must clarify the general extent of the West’s 
animosity and more specifically that of America, towards Islam and the Islamic 
civilisation. The West, with America at its head, is an enemy to Islam and the 
Muslims. It works to destroy the Islamic civilisation and prevent its return. The 
former secretary general of NATO Willie Claes stated; “The Alliance has placed Islam 
as a target for its hostility in place of the Soviet Union.” Eugene Ros!
tow, who from 1966-1969 was undersecretary of state for political affairs in President 
Johnson’s administration, stated; “America must stand in the ranks that are hostile to 
Islam and on the side of the Western world and Israel, because if she acts contrary to 
that then she has disowned her language, culture and institutions. The objective of 
the Western world in the Middle East is the destruction of the Islamic civilisation. 
The establishment of Israel is a part of that plan. This is nothing but a continuation 
of the crusades.”
In this clash of civilisations, America used to proceed quietly and secretly, so as 
not to incite the resentment of the Muslims. However, following September 11th, she 
realised that after all the efforts and money she has expended through these decades, 
she has failed to realise her aim of getting the Muslims to abandon their 
civilisation. On the contrary, the Ummah is even more convinced that she has a 
distinct civilisation and she seeks to live life on this basis, in the entity of the 
Righteous Khilafah. Hence, America launched her crusade when George Bush junior 
announced; “This crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take a long time.” A 
report (Dated 20/9/2002) presented by Bush to the American Congress, entitled the 
American national security strategy, stated the following; “We will never forget that 
in our war against terror we are fighting in the end for our democratic ideals and way 
of life. The war has started between freedom and fear. There will be no quick an!
d easy end to this war. Through our leadership of the campaign against terror we will 
be forming new and productive international relations and we will be redefining the 
existing relationships by means of which we will be able to face the challenges of the 
21st century.” So in America’s view, this war is primarily a war of civilisations, but 
she requires the reshaping of the Middle East so as to achieve the objectives she has 
set for it. The reality of a military strike against Iraq is that it is one link in a 
long chain of American crusader attacks against Iraq, designed to mould the situation 
in the region in accordance with the aims of her crusade. American deputy secretary of 
defence Paul Wolfowitz said in a press conference in Singapore; “It’s true that our 
war against terrorism is a war against evil people, but it is also ultimately a battle 
for ideals as well as a battle of minds.” He also said the following in a speech he 
gave on 4/5/2002; “There is a dangerous gap b!
etween the West and the Muslim world. We must bridge this gap, and we must begin now, 
for the gap is wide and there is no time for delay.” This contradicts America’s public 
statement of the aim as being one of ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. So 
the primary aim of the campaign against Iraq is to fight Islam and the Muslims as a 
civilisation and an Ummah, which is a crusader war.
As for the second aim; it is for oil. This is an issue that is linked to a long-term 
strategy of extending American influence over oil, which dates back to the seventies. 
America has made much headway in her pursuit of this goal. She wishes to control the 
following three capitals; Riyadh, Tehran and Baghdad, which will help her to achieve 
this aim. Of the