On Friday 22 January 2010 03:32:36 am James Agnew wrote:
> Hi Serbulent,
>
> Don't worry, this will definitely be corrected in the next release.
>
> Something seems to have gone quite wrong with the build process for
> the 1.0-beta1 JARs, there are a few missing and outdated classes in
> there. I
Hi Serbulent,
Don't worry, this will definitely be corrected in the next release.
Something seems to have gone quite wrong with the build process for
the 1.0-beta1 JARs, there are a few missing and outdated classes in
there. I'm planning on releasing a new beta within the next few days
to correct
On Thursday 20 August 2009 05:53:25 pm James Agnew wrote:
> Well.. One more thing to add, it looks like this changed between 0.4 and
> 0.5- In the 0.4 library TS-1 is a TSComponentOne, where in the 0.5 library
> it is an ST.
>
> Maybe the right thing to do here is just fix it as you suggest, I'm w
Well.. One more thing to add, it looks like this changed between 0.4 and
0.5- In the 0.4 library TS-1 is a TSComponentOne, where in the 0.5 library
it is an ST.
Maybe the right thing to do here is just fix it as you suggest, I'm worried
about other unintended consequences frrom chancing the hierar
Hi Serbulent,
Sorry I haven't gotten back to you on this, it's on my list of things to
think about but I'm not sure what the right answer is. Maybe someone else
here will have an idea.
You're definitely right, the first component of TS should be a
TSComponentOne. I'm not sure if that was the case
On Monday 10 August 2009 04:20:34 pm Serbulent Unsal wrote:
> > James would u think fix this issue in the mainstream ? Or is there a
> > better way to do this ?
>
> Ping ?
Ping again ?
--
Serbulent Unsal | Software Expert
GSM : +90 555 697 50 46 | Tel : +90.312.478 48 00
Akgun Softwares & Serv
On Thursday 06 August 2009 06:55:45 pm Serbulent Unsal wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 05:32:25 pm Serbulent Unsal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying Hapi's message validation example [1] but I couldn't get regex
> > rule exception as far as I change field values to non-valid ones. i.e in
> > the
On Friday 07 August 2009 01:34:27 am James Agnew wrote:
> Hi Serbulent,
>
> Can you post the code you use to add the regex rule?
>
> Cheers,
> James
No :) Because as I said in my first mail I use Hapi's message validation
example so I use DefaultValidationContext. I'm expecting working of rules
Hi Serbulent,
Can you post the code you use to add the regex rule?
Cheers,
James
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Serbulent Unsal <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 05:32:25 pm Serbulent Unsal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying Hapi's message validation ex
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 05:32:25 pm Serbulent Unsal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying Hapi's message validation example [1] but I couldn't get regex
> rule exception as far as I change field values to non-valid ones. i.e in
> the example I change the validMessage as below;
>
> String validMessage = "MS
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 05:32:25 pm Serbulent Unsal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying Hapi's message validation example [1] but I couldn't get regex
> rule exception as far as I change field values to non-valid ones. i.e in
> the example I change the validMessage as below;
>
> String validMessage = "MS
11 matches
Mail list logo
