Ok. In that case, I think it makes more sense to replicate the code of
ADT_AXX and add support for additional event triggers (as suggested by you
in previous message).
Appreciate your direction.
Regards,
Sagar Shah
James Agnew wrote:
>
> Hi Sagar,
>
> Yes, there is definitely nothing wrong wi
Hi Sagar,
Yes, there is definitely nothing wrong with using ADT_A01 to generate other
types of messages.
The only challenge you may run into is that some ADT message types will
have structures that ADT_A01 doesn't have. For example, an ADT_A17 has a
second set of PID and PV1 segments, and these s
Hi James,
I also had one more question to understand difference between ADT_AXX and
ADT_A01.
The issues that I am getting is with ADT_AXX. So what if I have to replace
this with ADT_A01.
Can I used ADT_A01 class to generate ADT A04, A05, A08 and A28 messages as
well?
I tried generating just MSH
Thanks a ton James for clarifications. I will look at ADT_AXX and create
another structure out of the same at my end and follow your instructions as
a work around.
Appreciate your suggestions.
Regards,
Sagar Shah
James Agnew wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This does indeed appear to be a bug in the gen
Hi All,
This does indeed appear to be a bug in the generator for the
superstructures unfortunately. Sagar, the good news is that your code
*should* work, you're doing the right thing. But the bad news is that it
isn't working obviously. :)
Superstructures are a brand new feature, and they haven't
Thanks a ton Christian for this.
I think I can make use of Terser to make it generic and use ADT_A01 as base
message, as there are some issues with ADT_AXX as reported in previous
message.
Christian Ohr-2 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can reproduce this problem. It seems that the MSH segment is not
> allo
Yes, I can reproduce this problem. It seems that the MSH segment is not
allowed e.g. for A01 message by the validator, which is obviously nonsense.
Maybe James can enlighten this a bit potentially there's a bug in the
generator.
After all, when creating messages I don't see a need to create
su
Thanks Christian for sharing this link.
I was trying to use ADT_AXX structure only, but found few issues with
generating HL7 message with ADT_AXX and did not find a way to solve that
out. So thought of checking for any other generic structure for ADT
messages.
Anyways, here's the issue I am facing
If you are using HAPI 2.1, you should have a look at this:
http://hl7api.sourceforge.net/xref/ca/uhn/hl7v2/examples/ExampleSuperStructures.html
.
cheers
Christian
2013/6/18 sagarshah1983
>
> That would be really great for me.
> Appreciate your reply and time for the same.
>
> Regards,
> Sagar
I posted this response a couple of weeks back to a similar question about ADT
generic.
Ian
---
I overcame this issue by creating a GENERIC_ADT message using techniques shown
on the Hapi site. Our establishment has many Z-segments, so I had to do all
those, and group them accordingly. A basic e
That would be really great for me.
Appreciate your reply and time for the same.
Regards,
Sagar Shah
LDH-2 wrote:
>
> I am not aware of one in 1.x... I don't know 2.x well enough yet. I am on
> the road, but I can send out later the type of code I have used to be adt
> generic.
>
>
>
> __
I am not aware of one in 1.x... I don't know 2.x well enough yet. I am on the
road, but I can send out later the type of code I have used to be adt generic.
___
Laurent Hasson (via my BlackBerry)
email: l...@360fresh.com
cell: 646-283-2186
twitter: @ldhas
12 matches
Mail list logo
