Hi James, this is great news! I had my HAPI-dependent applications compile and test against the beta2 and found no further obstacles (although I mainly only use the parser, model and util parts). So it's +1 from my side.
Christian James Agnew wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > A quick note: HAPI 1.1-beta2 has been posted to the > Sourceforge<http://sourceforge.net/projects/hl7api/files/hl7api-unstable/1.1-beta2/>file > release area. > > In other exciting news, it has also been posted to the central Maven > repo<http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/ca/uhn/hapi/>, > thanks to the hard work of Francis De Brabandere (thanks Francis!). This > means you will no longer need to add a custom repo to your pom.xml file in > order to use HAPI. > > HAPI beta1 had a fairly serious bug in it that prevented parsing of custom > structures (thanks to Christian Ohr for quickly noticing this) so it > should > not be used. If no new issues arise, we should be releasing 1.1 within a > week. > > Cheers, > James > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Hl7api-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/HAPI-1.1-beta2-Posted-tp31105913p31124361.html Sent from the hl7api-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Hl7api-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
