It is a big problem if I get my server reputation destroyed because of
Steams fault.
I'm still having massive "No Steam logon" kicks, the server score is
negative now and states my server as banned, the reputation is Downward fast
now and soon it will show "standing bad".
2011/10/27 msleeper
>
Just crashed when someone tried to go to the new map.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:49 PM, 1nsane <1nsane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not really.
>
> The servers of mine where I disabled all hats are doing super awesome now.
> The ones I left with hats aren't doing as good.
>
> Disabling people from equip
Not really.
The servers of mine where I disabled all hats are doing super awesome now.
The ones I left with hats aren't doing as good.
Disabling people from equipping hats stopped the client crashes.
So I'm sure it affects the score.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:29 PM, msleeper wrote:
> Assuming
Assuming it does affect the score, it shouldn't be a big problem since
it affected everyone.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Daniel G wrote:
> I wonder if the constant mass client kicks for "No Steam logon" will affect
> a server reputation?
> My server currently lost > 2000 server score just be
I wonder if the constant mass client kicks for "No Steam logon" will affect
a server reputation?
My server currently lost > 2000 server score just because of the unreliable
steam service and its "No Steam logon" kicks that are currently going on the
whole damn day.
2011/10/26 w4rezz
> Thanks god
Thanks god.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
I actually think that they might have added additional 3 levels to it to
make it more clear :)
-ics
26.10.2011 8:09, Emil Larsson kirjoitti:
Huh, well this explains why I only saw those trends. I actually thought the
system was binary with trends, but apparently that as not intended behavior.
Huh, well this explains why I only saw those trends. I actually thought the
system was binary with trends, but apparently that as not intended behavior.
Looking forward to more accurate trends now. :)
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Fletcher Dunn
wrote:
> There has been a bug in the TF2 server r
Thanks for clearing this up.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Fletcher Dunn
wrote:
> There has been a bug in the TF2 server reputation trend calculation.
> Previously, it would only report that the reputation was either "slightly
> upward" or "downward fast."
>
> It will be fixed in the next upd
There has been a bug in the TF2 server reputation trend calculation.
Previously, it would only report that the reputation was either "slightly
upward" or "downward fast."
It will be fixed in the next update, to properly show five different levels: up
fast, up slow, steady, down slow, and down
10 matches
Mail list logo
