Ah ... thank you very much!
Chun
> Il giorno 07 apr 2017, alle ore 16:43, Konrad Slind
> ha scritto:
>
> To print theory "foo" as html :
>
>DB.html_theory "foo";
>
> Konrad.
>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Chun Tian (binghe)
>>
To print theory "foo" as html :
DB.html_theory "foo";
Konrad.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Chun Tian (binghe)
wrote:
> yes, I know these signature files, I use them too (when the proofs do not
> interest me), but I found that, in signatures, all theorems and
yes, I know these signature files, I use them too (when the proofs do not
interest me), but I found that, in signatures, all theorems and definitions
are sorted in lexicographic order, which is sometimes very different from
the source scripts. But the source scripts well preserved the
Hi Chun,
learning Holyhammer is also on my TODO list.
One minor trick. I often look at the theory signature instead of the
Script-file. So I read "relationTheory.sig". For the theories comming
with HOL, the signature is available in the HTML help. For my own
theories, I just open the
Thanks again, this is really convenient.
Actually a large piece of my time was spent on reading HOL's
relationScript.sml and other scripts that I needed, I try to find useful
theorems by their name (otherwise I couldn't know RTC_CASES*, RTC_INDUCT,
RTC_SINGLE, etc.), but maybe the scripts are too
Hi Chun,
by the way. I always find DB.match and DB.find very helpful. You can for
example try
DB.print_match [] ``RTC``
DB.print_match [] ``RTC _ x x``
DB.print_find "RTC"
to find interesting theorems about RTC.
Cheers
Thomas
On 07.04.2017 12:51, Chun Tian (binghe) wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
Hi Thomas,
Thank you very much!! Obviously I didn't know those RTC_ALT* and RTC_RIGHT*
series of theorems before. Now I can prove something new:)
Best regards,
Chun
On 7 April 2017 at 12:08, Thomas Tuerk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) They are the same. You can easily proof
Hi,
1) They are the same. You can easily proof with induction (see below).
2) Yes you can prove it. You would also do it via some kind of induction
proof. However there is no need, since it is already present in the
relationTheory as RTC_INDUCT_RIGHT1.
Cheers
Thomas
open relationTheory