Re: [Hol-info] assumption matching in SPLIT_LT

2018-10-12 Thread Jeremy Dawson
Hi Waqar, Firstly (simplest), SPLIT_LT 2 (ALLGOALS tac1, ALL_LT) applies tac1 to the first two subgoals and does nothing to the remainder. Then you can work on the remaining goal. But you want to also apply EVERY [tac2, tac3, ...] to the third subgoal (which is the only remaining one),

Re: [Hol-info] assumption matching in SPLIT_LT

2018-10-12 Thread Waqar Ahmad via hol-info
Hi, Suppose, I have 3 subgoals where first 2 subgoals can be proved by apply tac1 and the third goal may takes some set of tacts, say tac2, tac3... Is it possible that I can use SPLIT_LT in a way such that first two subgoals are discharged by applying tac1 and I only end up proving the third