Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Ted Lemon
On Apr 18, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Simon Perreault wrote: > I don't know how Android does it, but any DHCPv6 client is free to > unilaterally attempt configuration. It doesn't need to wait for an RA to > tell it to do so. RAs are just a hint. Sure, but then it's completely disconnected from the comin

Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Simon Perreault
Le 2014-04-18 11:56, Ted Lemon a écrit : > On Apr 18, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Simon Perreault > wrote: >> Got it. So, summarizing, for Android, DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options would >> likely not be problematic, but an RA option likely would. > > This is weird, though. How does a DHCPv6 client know to att

Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Ted Lemon
On Apr 18, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Simon Perreault wrote: > Got it. So, summarizing, for Android, DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options would > likely not be problematic, but an RA option likely would. This is weird, though. How does a DHCPv6 client know to attempt configuration, if it doesn't see RAs? I jus

Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Alejandro Acosta
Hi Philip, El 4/18/2014 3:28 AM, Philip Homburg escribió: > In your letter dated Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:16:19 -0430 you wrote: >> I like the idea of having the No-IPv4 option for DHCPv6. I don't like >> the idea of having this option in a v4 world; mainly because in mix >> networks where you might h

Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Simon Perreault
Le 2014-04-17 23:49, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Simon Perreault > mailto:simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca>> wrote: > > Le 2014-04-16 12:25, Simon Kelley a écrit : > > Android uses dhcpcd as its DHCP client. > > Thought about this some more... Doesn't dhcp

Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Simon Perreault
Le 2014-04-17 17:14, Mark Andrews a écrit : >>> 0 full IPv4 connectivity >>> 1 all IPv4 off on the interface >>> 2 local (link/site not global) connectivity only on the interface >>> 3 no IPv4 on the machine. >> >> Uh, no. The levels are in strictly increasing order. 2 includes >> e

Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

2014-04-18 Thread Philip Homburg
In your letter dated Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:16:19 -0430 you wrote: > I like the idea of having the No-IPv4 option for DHCPv6. I don't like >the idea of having this option in a v4 world; mainly because in mix >networks where you might have some folks which only speak IPv4, imagine >a case where this o