Hi,
Please see my responses in line.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
Hi Daniel,
- the architecture document describes how to outsource DNS zone
outside
the home network to any third party by re-using only existing
On 10 Sep 2014, at 15:48, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
wrote:
Perhaps it's worth delaying the discussion about promoting these to WG
status until after you publish the next version, then?
No, we're discussing them now.
Drafts are neither expected nor required to be
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
I’ve heard it said over and over in HOMENET sessions that we weren’t
going to put new requirements on the host stacks. Why is this draft
interesting?
HOMENET doesn't require new host stack functionality. What part of the
draft makes you think
On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
I’ve heard it said over and over in HOMENET sessions that we weren’t going
to put new requirements on the host stacks. Why is this draft interesting?
HOMENET doesn't
On 9/10/14 11:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
My point was the even if this draft is accepted by 6MAN, standardized,
and even implemented some day, it doesn’t satisfy the HOMENET
multi-homed routing requirement.
I don't get it. Could you
