On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Andrew Mcgregor wrote:
The TP-Link Archer C7 seems quite nice, although I've only been playing
with it less than 24 hours; my opernwrt build seems unable to send more
than 100 Mbps over the ethernet, but the WiFi side is quite fast; I saw
270 Mbps of TCP sourced from iperf
On Feb 24, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Andrew Mcgregor wrote:
> WNDR4300
It looks like they released a new version in December of 2014 that isn't
supported by OpenWRT. :(
___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
I should note that the Netgear series includes all these model numbers:
WNDR37AV v2
WNDR3700 v2 and v4 (NOT v3!!!)
WNDR3800
WNDR4300
Of which, the 4300 is probably the one to have, having 3x3 radios on
both bands and 128 MB of flash (3700 v4 also has the large flash).
Otherwise the differences are
>> Another question -- is it possible to participate in Trickle-driven
>> flooding without building the full topology graph?
> The current answer based on strict reading of the spec is no.
[...]
> Is this desirable to be changed? Probably so.
There's not only the stub case that you consider, but
>> should not send packets larger than 1500 octets unless it has assurance
>> that the destination is capable of reassembling packets of that larger
>> size.
> I guess this is another MUST to be added to HNCP text (DNCP itself is
> not IPv6-specific as such).
You mean that every HNCP node MUST ba
On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>>> I'd be a bit curious to know what people are using for test hardware.
>>
>> The WNDR3800/WNDR3700v2 is still my favourite. I've still got a couple
>> Asus 500GP v1, and they're ju
Mikael wrote privately (and I asked to quote):
> Since I'm designing for a network with gig speed access to the home, when
> someone comes and says they want to take into account a 5 year old device
> with 4 MB flash and a 5 year old slow CPU accessing the network over bad
> wifi,
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:42:47PM -0800, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Q: Did i hear it correctly, there is no standard "show mac-address-table" like
> CLI on linux/openwrt for built-in switches ?
Right. Usually communication to these built-in switches is limited due
to lack of documentation, la
