Dear all,
I will reject the errata as the WG consensus is to reject it.
Kulvinder, thank you for submitting it (even if finally rejected)
Regards and Happy New Year to all
-éric
-Original Message-
From: homenet on behalf of "STARK, BARBARA H"
Date: Saturday, 2 January 2021 at
> > My apologies, you are correct. I’ve now seen RFC 1034 which details the
> terminator.
>
> Grand so. I'll ask Eric V. to hit the reject button on this
> when he gets back to work after the holidays.
Agreed. Thx, all. Happy New (Gregorian) Year.
Barbara
On 02/01/2021 15:15, Kulvinder wrote:
My apologies, you are correct. I’ve now seen RFC 1034 which details the
terminator.
Grand so. I'll ask Eric V. to hit the reject button on this
when he gets back to work after the holidays.
Thanks all,
S.
--
Kulvinder Matharu
*From: *Ted Lemon
It’s nonsense. We put the dots on the end on purpose—it’s not an FQDN
otherwise. :/
> On Jan 2, 2021, at 9:33 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>
> Any opinions on this from authors/list? My take would be that
> this can be rejected as inclusion of full stops within quotes
> is stylistically
Any opinions on this from authors/list? My take would be that
this can be rejected as inclusion of full stops within quotes
is stylistically correct and that there's no technical issue
with including the root's dot in a DNS name. But maybe some
other convention has been followed for DNS RFCs in
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8375,
"Special-Use Domain 'home.arpa.'".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6378
--
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Kulvinder
