Hi Matt,
Thanks for the review. I am only responding to the major comments - for
now. I apologize for the partial response but I promise I will go through
all other comments tomorrow (my) morning and hope you will still have this
partial response (your) morning.
Yours,
Daniel
On Mon, Oct 17, 202
Hi,
Thanks for the review. So the reason we do not consider DOH is that DoH
8484 has been defined for communications between a client and a resolver
while in our case TLS is used between two authoritative servers.
This document focuses on communication between DNS
clients (such as operating
Thanks Al. That is what we understood and made the change in our local
copy. I expect to publish it today or tomorrow.
Yours,
Daniel
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 1:09 PM Al Morton via Datatracker
wrote:
> Reviewer: Al Morton
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> In Appendix A, the text says, "In this *sectio
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-21: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
