Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Le 07/10/2019 à 15:25, Ted Lemon a écrit : On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:33 AM, Alexandre Petrescu mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>> wrote: If somebody makes a good solution and easily deployed for the topology in the above figure, then I am willing to consider it for vehicular networks a

Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Le 04/10/2019 à 02:39, Ted Lemon a écrit : (If you got this as a Bcc, it’s because I am hoping you can contribute to the discussion, but might not be on the mailing list to which I sent the question, so please answer on-list if you are willing.) I’ve been involved in some discussions

Re: [homenet] Support for RFC 7084 on shipping devices...

Le 07/10/2019 à 06:05, Gyan Mishra a écrit : [...] For IPv4 in general across the board all broadband routers openWrt or otherwise pnp setup have a dhcp wan IP and LAN side is RFC 1918 192.xx and nat overload is done from inside to outside. Pretty basic and it works well. For IPv6 we have the

Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?

Le 17/09/2019 à 15:34, Ted Lemon a écrit : On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Petrescu mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks for the reply. As I do not author the draft, and my colleague is not subscribed to this list, I paste here his reply to your qu

Re: [homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?

Le 17/09/2019 à 14:27, Ted Lemon a écrit : On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:06 AM, Alexandre Petrescu mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>> wrote: This draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 describes a YANG model for uCPE. A Customer Premises Entity is for enterpise and home networks. Is this draft appro

[homenet] appropriateness of draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 to homenet WG?

Hi, This draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-03 describes a YANG model for uCPE. A Customer Premises Entity is for enterpise and home networks. Is this draft appropriate here? Alex ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org

Re: [homenet] low latency handovers in wifi (was: New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt)

Le 30/11/2015 15:18, Dave Taht a écrit : On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Dave Taht wrote: Well, in the two or more radio (2.4 and 5ghz) case, you can easily roam between the two radios with many chipsets. Some chipsets only

Re: [homenet] How many people have installed the homenet code?

I have not. But I am constantly checking the IPv6 and routing/bridging features in off-the-shelf WiFi Access Points designed for home. A recent otherwise highly performing 802.11ac AP from Netgear explicitely requests the user to disable IPv6 in the home network in order for its Genie

Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt

Hi, Using host-based routes in a homenet to support mobility (rather than Mobile IP) may make sense because the domain is relatively small. The draft could benefit from illustrating at least a simple topology, to understand what the author really means, because there are very many possible