> On Jul 29, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>
I think you mean E1 - that's what the instructions use for the wide area
interface.
>>>
>>> It looks like one of us is confused.
>
>> It looks like it was me. :-)
>
> Why not rename the
>> The Commission for Truth in Advertising requires me to mention that the
>> last feature is not quite ready yet -- with current software, when one
>> provider goes down, you might need to manually disable the router that's
>> connected to that provider.
> The Commission for Truth in Advertising
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:28:09PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> - you can extend your wireless range by just connecting an extra router.
>As the network expands, the routers will automatically compute the best
>paths and route packets accordingly;
[..]
> The Commission for
> Also... I'm aware that the Installing Homenet guide elides the reasons for
> using it. Do we have a short paragraph that tells *why* a lay person would
> want to use Homenet?
> - No configuration - Homenet routers figure out how things are connected
> and do the right thing
Agreed, but
>>> I think you mean E1 - that's what the instructions use for the wide area
>>> interface.
>>
>> It looks like one of us is confused.
> It looks like it was me. :-)
Why not rename the interfaces to "internal" and "external"?
> This is a corollary of your assertion at IETF the other day ("if
Also... I'm aware that the Installing Homenet guide elides the reasons for
using it. Do we have a short paragraph that tells *why* a lay person would want
to use Homenet?
If I'm not mistaken, these are the big attributes:
- No configuration - Homenet routers figure out how things are
Thanks again for your comments. They're reflected in the new draft:
https://gist.github.com/richb-hanover/ec88b851c4da074e48003e6fe9276901
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>
>> Should the procedure remain silent on the firewall? Or