Re: [homenet] Security considerations for the Babel routing protocol

2015-04-12 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> I utterly disagree with your main so-called conclusion. [...] > I'll send a more detailed response off-list Respectful disagreement expressed by private mail, as Stephen requested. -- Juliusz ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ie

Re: [homenet] Security considerations for the Babel routing protocol

2015-04-12 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 08/04/15 02:56, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Dear Stephen, > > Following your request of 5 April 2015, Well, I didn't quite request exactly that, but fair play. It's good to see the analysis begun, though I utterly disagree with your main so-called conclusion. I'll send a more detailed resp

[homenet] Security considerations for the Babel routing protocol

2015-04-07 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Dear Stephen, Following your request of 5 April 2015, I have published the following Internet-Draft: Security considerations for the Babel routing protocol draft-chroboczek-babel-security-considerations-00 I also attract your attention to the following RFC: RFC 7298: Babel Hashed