Hi Stephen,
Please find inline some responses or follow-up discussion.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 3:37 PM Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> A few responses below...
>
> On 26/05/2021 18:02, Daniel Migault wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > Thanks for the questions / suggestions /
Hiya,
A few responses below...
On 26/05/2021 18:02, Daniel Migault wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the questions / suggestions / comments. Please find some
responses inline. I updated the document [1] and added issues on the
git repo.
Yours, Daniel
[1]
Hi Juliusz,
I think we responded to the question in 2014 [1]. I am happy to clarify our
text of section 1.2. Could you please point out what in the draft you
believe is wrong and what you would like to be updated.
Yours,
Daniel
[1]
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the questions / suggestions / comments. Please find some
responses inline. I updated the document [1] and added issues on the git
repo.
Yours,
Daniel
[1]
> #5 The arguments why this is better than DDNS don't convince
> me, except for the last one (new RR types). Given that DDNS is
> deployed, what's the chances that this would also get traction?
I think that's an important point. I actually asked the very same
question back in 2014:
Hiya,
I had a read of this one. My comments (as an individual, not
as chair) below. I'll chat with Barbara to see if we have a
common position on how to handle next steps but am happy to
chat about stuff below whenever.
Cheers,
S.
review of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-15
