Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:53:32PM -0700, james woodyatt wrote:
> The protocols we are developing here in HOMENET are for the tiny
> minority of people who prefer to build their own home networks instead
In that case, we're wasting effort. "The tiny minority" can just take
an OpenWRT box,
james woodyatt wrote:
> Moreover, I don't believe there are any ISPs that are interested in the
> "My Friendly ISP" model at this time. And I would further contend that
> the word "friendly" is doing some rather Orwellian political work in
> that construction.
On 10/26/2017 11:39 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:32:44AM -0700, james woodyatt wrote:
Accordingly, I strongly recommend that HOMENET dispense with the "My
Friendly ISP" model with extreme prejudice, and adopt what I shall call
the "HOMENET Castle Doctrine" as a matter of
On Oct 26, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> "Normal" People just don't buy a second router for their ISP link if they
> already have one, or a 3rd and 4th one if they happen to have two ISP
> links.
Yup. This is why Google Home, Apple Home, Amazon Echo, Eero, Ubiquiti,
On 26 Oct 2017, at 14:39, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:32:44AM -0700, james woodyatt wrote:
Accordingly, I strongly recommend that HOMENET dispense with the "My
Friendly ISP" model with extreme prejudice, and adopt what I shall
call
the "HOMENET Castle Doctrine" as a
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:32:44AM -0700, james woodyatt wrote:
> Accordingly, I strongly recommend that HOMENET dispense with the "My
> Friendly ISP" model with extreme prejudice, and adopt what I shall call
> the "HOMENET Castle Doctrine" as a matter of working group policy.
I claim that
On 10/26/2017 08:22 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>On 10/24/2017 07:00 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>>
I find the model of "there is a CPE, and behind that CPE, I connect
another router to get homenet functionality" a bit unsatisfactory.
I think there are two possible deployment models.
1. The «
> I find the model of "there is a CPE, and behind that CPE, I connect
> another router to get homenet functionality" a bit unsatisfactory.
I think there are two possible deployment models.
1. The « My Friendly ISP » model
Every ISP-provided CPE participates in HNCP. Each ISP has access to all
james woodyatt wrote:
>>
>> [...] and also what may or may not be good to include in requirements
>> specifically targeting routers at the customer's edge (CE).
> I think it's a waste of time for HOMENET to propose requirements for
> routers in service