Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-08-11 Thread Daniel Migault
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Tim Chown wrote: > Hi, > > On the principle of the WG agreeing to work on the problems as itemised in > the current headings in the table of contents, I support adoption, i.e., > it’s something homenet should work on, but it’s quite

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-08-11 Thread Tim Chown
Hi, On the principle of the WG agreeing to work on the problems as itemised in the current headings in the table of contents, I support adoption, i.e., it’s something homenet should work on, but it’s quite possible that the draft when it moves to WGLC may look somewhat different. Someone

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-08-09 Thread STARK, BARBARA H
Thanks Daniel. And you’re not too late. The call ends this coming Friday. So if anyone else wants to chime in, please do. I’ll try to create a summary Thursday describing what I think I’ve heard so far. That should give everyone a brief chance to tell me how badly I’ve misinterpreted their

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-08-09 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, I apology for the late response (I was off for two weeks). I will update the draft by the end of the month integrating numerous feed backs we received. As a co-author I am supporting the adoption of this document architecture. I believe that given the current situation regarding homenet and

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-31 Thread Michael Richardson
Ted Lemon wrote: > to put the CFA on hold pending that update. There have been some good > comments already, though; in particular, I think Juliusz' point that it > would > be nice to actually try some of this in practice is good, and is what > I'm We

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-31 Thread Tim Chown
Hi, I’d recommend people who are interested in this topic read draft-cheshire-dnssd-roadmap-00, which you might miss if just looking at the draft-sctl-* drafts. Tim > On 31 Jul 2017, at 13:09, Ted Lemon wrote: > > This is an architecture document, not a protocol

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-31 Thread Ted Lemon
This is an architecture document, not a protocol specification. On Jul 31, 2017 7:36 AM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" wrote: > > I wanted to know if the scope of this is reasonable and is what the > > working group wants to take on. > > I think the scope of this is too wide. It tries to

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-31 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> I wanted to know if the scope of this is reasonable and is what the > working group wants to take on. I think the scope of this is too wide. It tries to solve a number of different problems: 1. naming within the Homenet; 2. publishing names of Homenet nodes outside the Homenet; 3.

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-31 Thread Ray Bellis
On 31/07/2017 10:53, Ted Lemon wrote: > Daniel wanted to do another update, but we needed to sync up first, and > I don't know where he is at with that now, but I think it would be > reasonable to put the CFA on hold pending that update. There have been > some good comments already, though; in

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-31 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jul 30, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> and then there is draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support as a normative reference. > > concerns me most. Unless it's in RFC-editor queue (it's not, it's expired!), > I'm pretty sure it's a very much normative reference.

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-30 Thread Michael Richardson
Tim Chown wrote: > See Stuart’s deck from Prague for context: > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-dnssd-dns-sd-update-and-new-work-items-00.pdf >> and then there is draft-ietf-mid-mpvd-ndp-support as a normative reference. >> Will

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-30 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> I have some other fairly serious nits about this document, but I believe > that the argument above is sufficient. I am opposed to adoption at this > stage, but look forward to reconsidering once dnssd has had a serious look > at the protocols. I didn't want the point of the previous mail to be

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-30 Thread Tim Chown
Hi, > On 30 Jul 2017, at 18:19, Michael Richardson wrote: > > I have read homenet-naming. > > It wasn't quite the document I was expecting. > But rather seems to leverage upon a number of other draft-sctl* documents in > progress. > > What are the plans for

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-30 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> It wasn't quite the document I was expecting. But rather seems to > leverage upon a number of other draft-sctl* documents in progress. I agree with Michael -- this is not a protocol definition, it is an informal outline of how a number of other protocols can be made to fit together. It has

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-30 Thread Michael Richardson
I have read homenet-naming. It wasn't quite the document I was expecting. But rather seems to leverage upon a number of other draft-sctl* documents in progress. What are the plans for draft-sctl-*? and then there is draft-ietf-mid-mpvd-ndp-support as a normative reference. Will homenet will to

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-07-28 Thread STARK, BARBARA H
Hi homenet, Thanks to all of you for your well-wishes and congratulations (and condolences) for my new role as a homenet chair. As my first official act, under the excellent tutelage of Ray, I'm launching a 2 week Call for Adoption on draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming. The call will end August