Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Ted Lemon
On Dec 12, 2016, at 4:56 PM, james woodyatt wrote: > I would strongly prefer that we avoid the risks above by using a > special-purpose subdomain of a gTLD owned by IETF. I don’t really care which > gTLD we use, and if “arpa” is really the only reasonable choice, then so be >

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Ted Lemon
That is not an option for this working group. Whether or not it is a good idea is another topic, but that option is definitely not an option for this working group, because it is not in our charter. If some other working group _had already gotten_ such a TLD, then we could talk about using it,

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Ted Lemon
On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Ralph Droms > wrote: >> There are two approaches we can take to this. One is to proceed--ask ICANN >> to do the delegation and see what happens. The other is to take the more >> expedient, less satisfying

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Ted Lemon
One thing that I think the working group should be aware of, although I don't know if this awareness will change anything, is that the situation with the .homenet allocation is less simple than we would prefer: it's not really simply a matter of adding .homenet to the special use domain names

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Ralph Droms
Ted - thanks for posting a clear summary of the situation for WG discussion and consensus. Two questions in line… > On Dec 12, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > > One thing that I think the working group should be aware of, although I don't > know if this awareness will

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Ted Lemon
That is a separate discussion. We can't standardize on a process that doesn't yet exist. On Dec 12, 2016 1:59 PM, "james woodyatt" wrote: > On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon wrote: > > > I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

2016-12-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <585d7369-28a8-4b6d-be77-c94b42ca4...@google.com>, james woodyatt writes: > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon wrote: > > > > I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the advantage > > that the IAB controls .arpa, and so we can get an unsecure