Re: [Hornlist] Not really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-12 Thread Eric James
--- Wendell Rider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He [Mozart] was as pure a musician as ever lived- just wired for it. Music flowed from his veins. His lack of ability to exist financially in the real world of his time, by sucking up to the powers that were. probably cost him his life.

RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-11 Thread Hans.Pizka
: Monday, April 10, 2006 1:39 PM To: 'The Horn List' Subject: RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan And I often thought what kind of music the genius would write if he were alive today. Regards, Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] s.edu] On Behalf

RE: [Hornlist] Not really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-11 Thread Hans.Pizka
:59 -0400 from: Steve Freides [EMAIL PROTECTED] subject: RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan Herbert Foster wrote: I suspect that there is also a political dimension [to Mozart's music]. Perhaps. Mozart's music, with notable exceptions, is aristocratic, and in that sense

RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-11 Thread Daniel Canarutto
Steve Freides wrote: Mozart is arguably the greatest composer to ever have walked the face of this Earth. For a musician not to like Mozart means only that the musician doesn't understand Mozart. Thank you Steve, you spoke the absolute truth. Several times, by now, I read in posts coming

RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-11 Thread Jonathan West
Thank you Steve, you spoke the absolute truth. Several times, by now, I read in posts coming from the other side of the pond: I don't care for Mozart, I don't like Beethoven, Tchaikovsky is boring etc. I'm reminded of the Bluffers Guide to Music which states There are only four truly great

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-11 Thread David Goldberg
Jonathan West wrote: I'm reminded of the Bluffers Guide to Music which states There are only four truly great composers. Bach, Beethoven, Mozart and your own particular favourite. Which reminds me of the famous 4 B's of composing (you thought there were only 3 B's, right?): Bach, Beethoven,

RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan (a bit long)

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Hirsch
As I read this thread, I am feeling a number of conflicting emotions. I happen to appreciate all that has been said in the divine one's behalf and agree with most of it, but I feel discouraged seeing so much energy wasted on defending him so needlessly. There are in fact many facets of his

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will come back to Mozart perhaps if you are more matured to enjoy the greatness achieved through simplicity cleaness. And if Mozart is done earnestly, it strucks by the power. But it might be much different for younger people, who like more the big splash big bang. But it is also possible

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-10 Thread Shane McLaughlin
This is really hard to explain... Playing Mozart is not usually technically hard. It offers you the chance (and demands you) play very cleanly, because the textures are thin and you can hear every part very precisely, because the rhythms are simple enough to line up in tune, because the

RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-10 Thread Steve Freides
Herbert Foster wrote: I suspect that there is also a political dimension [to Mozart's music]. Perhaps. Mozart's music, with notable exceptions, is aristocratic, and in that sense, undemocratic. Elegant is not the same as aristocratic. Mozart is arguably the greatest composer to ever

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-10 Thread Paul Mansur
Not like Mozart!?? Well, it takes all kinds. Shane lists a few things in favor about Mozart's music. Almost without exception, I think the great attraction of Mozart is really his near perfection and absolute lucidity. Playing Mozart requires one's full attention on what appears to be

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-10 Thread Linda Sherman
I think it's possible to admire a composition (or its performance) on technical and esthetic merits, yet not connect emotionally with the results. I think that's the response some people, including myself, have to many of Mozart's works. Linda ___

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-09 Thread BrassArtsUnlim
In a message dated 4/9/2006 5:13:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I like music that, when you're done playing it, you're thinking What a ride! I just don't get that from Mozart. I think Mozart's too pretty, the harmonies are simple, and the music is too predictable.

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-09 Thread Walter E. Lewis
Everyone has their likes and dislikes, as for me, I will take any of Wolfie's music any day. He's one of my favorites. To think that he could compose completely in his mind and then just scribble and bibble on paper just blows me away. I just love his music, and could listen to it all day

Re: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-09 Thread David Lamb
Kim Newell: I think Mozart's too pretty, the harmonies are simple, and the music is too predictable. -- Dave Weiner: Glenn Gould shared your outlook. Ah! That would explain his recordings of the piano sonatas. David Lamb in Seattle ___

RE: [Hornlist] Not Really a Mozart Fan

2006-04-09 Thread Steve Freides
David Lamb wrote: Kim Newell: I think Mozart's too pretty, the harmonies are simple, and the music is too predictable. -- Dave Weiner: Glenn Gould shared your outlook. Ah! That would explain his recordings of the piano sonatas. Glenn Gould's recordings of many things other