C CC wrote:
There is a treatment called Annealing. Does it affect the perfomance
of mouthpiece much?
I was skeptical of the procedure at first. As I wrote on the list a few
days ago, I tried the same model of mouthpiece non-annealed and
annealed. I noticed a subtle difference in the resultant
Hi Bill - thank you for the explanation. I simply couldn't relate the phrase pop
tone with a specific action discussed in your note. I personally am not sure that
pop tone will tell us much about how a given mouthpiece will react with the horn it is
in, but it certainly might. I have always
David Jewell wrote about the pop tone:
I have always recommended against that particular test for
anyone other than a committed adult amateur/professional because it
usually causes needlessly stuck and jammed mouthpieces, given that
junior high kids especially can't seem to judge the amount of
...Annealing. Does it affect the performance of mouthpiece much?
I tried the same model of mouthpiece non-annealed and annealed (and) I
noticed
a subtle difference in the resultant tone quality
Before or after you knew which was annealed?
Ever seen a Ferrari driver who was dissatisfied
Cabbage gave a very good explanation of 'pop tone', as I understand it.
It is a tone with a frequency related to the volume of the mouthpiece
cup. This allows comparing variations in both depth and diameter in a
single parameter. Since it is a function primarily of cavity size, that
would
Dear all,
There is a treatment called Annealing. Does it affect the perfomance of mouthpiece
much?
CCC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mobile.yahoo.com.hk/
___
post: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe or set options at
I have never heard that annealing is used to improve a
mouthpiece. Why
should a mouth piece be hardened (annealed) ??? For a mouth
piece it is
necessary to possess the proper width, depth, bore, shaft
weight
smoothness of the rim shoulders rim width back bore
straight or
Hi Bill - just what exactly do you mean by 'pop tone? I don't understand what you
are describing.
Paxmaha
william bamberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My questions come in here. I've become reasonably convinced that 'pop tone' is an
important consideration in the performance of any given
I've been using a Thomas Greer B12 mouthpiece over the past year. It's been
a wonderful mouthpiece for me. I have a Denis Wick 'booster' on it. I've
been told that the 'weight' that the DW booster adds really doesn't 'work'
as an added weight since when attaching it to a mouthpiece the inner
jlmthompson wrote:
So the question would be IF the extra weight of a Megamoose does in
fact enhance the 'slotting' of tones without the loss of slurring ability
and it allows for louder dynamics without overblowing as suggested does the
DW booster when placed on an independent mpc do the same
on 6/19/04 18:05, Greg Campbell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jlmthompson wrote:
So the question would be IF the extra weight of a Megamoose does in
fact enhance the 'slotting' of tones without the loss of slurring ability
and it allows for louder dynamics without overblowing as suggested
I'll make some engineering 'guesses' to try to explain what I think
might be going on as a way to ask some questions of my own that I hope
can be answered by someone with real experience.
The processes involved in making a mouthpiece involve applying a lot of
mechanical and thermal stress to
12 matches
Mail list logo
