The key for moving people from one-time to many-time contribution is
motivation.
I have seen volunteers suddenly much more motivated when I commented with
more
than a few words on a validation I did. But at least equally important is
task and tile size.
Large tasks are tackled more than a few
Ralf and John.
I don't either of you are ranting but providing good feedback that aligns
with my own thinking about tasks. I favor smaller tasks that can be
completed quickly rather than huge tasks that take multiple mappers to
complete.
One thing that I think we are moving towards is a set of
Hi Martin,
This would address one of the issues you raised. Feel free to keep the
discussion going on it:
https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/606
*Tyler Radford*
Executive Director
email: tyler.radf...@hotosm.org
U.S. mobile: +1 617.285.2009
*Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team *
Perhaps what we need to do is do a small reality check. The HOT tile
system is geared up to one mapper completing one tile then a second mapper
validating it. The first mapper then corrects any errors if any and the
tile is validated and marked completed.
Yes but that doesn't seem to be quite
Something that baffles me about the TM is that when a task is split, the
original tile seems to disappear from existence, even though people could
still have a reference to it, they will get a not found message and they
can't read the comments anymore.
As a long time OSM contritbutor, I started
Dear all,
This is an interesting topic, I think what is important is to focus on
how the data will be useful for responders & communities on the ground.
On some requests (particularly for humanitarian operations), what we
really need is to obtain a first overview of an area (villages & roads)
I raised https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/718 focused
only on the front page list/different purposes it serves. Ideas or examples
of other 'task priority' UI encouraged.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jo wrote:
> Something that baffles me about the TM
I think Daniel’s suggestion is a good idea; we don’t make nearly enough use of
the front page. I would also like the ability to use custom filters, perhaps
based off the task hashtags?
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> I
We have great training materials to onboard new mappers. Maybe its
time to focus on developing more materials for validation and recruit
more validators?
The current tasking manager requires you to validate each task. But,
in most cases, quality of edits depend on a specific mapper. We can
do