[HOT] Request: Volunteer very experienced in OSM administrative boundary conflation

Hi all, HOT (Helen Campbell from NetHope and myself really are looking for this project) is looking for someone who is very experienced in OSM Admin Boundary conflation and OSM relations. Knowing a little bit of other GIS tools would also be very helpful. There is possibility of importing of

Re: [HOT] Maps.Me in Tanzania

In case you missed it (it was in the WeeklyOSM), you can now create an RSS feed (or visualize) with changesets by editor using one of Simon Poole's tools: http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/ The only thing is that you have to zoom in to an unreasonably high zoom to be able to get a

Re: [HOT] Request: Suggestions for improvements to iD OSM Web Editor

I am really coming to the conclusion that everything might just want to take a uri to an xml document as much as possible if it is just a list of something that can be put in xml easily. then we could have different, specific checks, customized for our use cases and just by changing a url

Re: [HOT] Request: Suggestions for improvements to iD OSM Web Editor

My suggestion was a tick box in the "map data" pane to turn QA elements on/off. I like your suggestion during save as well. My focus is predominately on road names in OSM so improving that visually is a priority for me. -Aaron. > On May 17, 2016, at 08:08, Blake Girardot

Re: [HOT] Request: Suggestions for improvements to iD OSM Web Editor

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Young wrote: > I actually communicated with Bryan yesterday about a small QA toolset for iD. > It's my understanding that using tools like keep right is preferable but if > iD had a few basic QA tools I believe data quality would

Re: [HOT] Request: Suggestions for improvements to iD OSM Web Editor

I actually communicated with Bryan yesterday about a small QA toolset for iD. It's my understanding that using tools like keep right is preferable but if iD had a few basic QA tools I believe data quality would increase overall and you would get more users taking interest in QA efforts

Re: [HOT] Moving the focus to JOSM in mapathons

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Claire Halleux wrote: > The only issue is that there's always at least one or few participants > without updated antivirus software and we always end up with at least one > infected USB stick. There are also write-protected USB