Re: [HOT] Buildings and HOT's reputation in OSM

2017-12-10 Thread john whelan
I would agree with you on shape visually but the area of a building is used by some to estimate population and the question is when we change the shape we also change the area albeit slightly. My scientific background suggests this is an additional element of error. However given the quality of

[HOT] weeklyOSM #385 2017-11-28-2017-12-04

2017-12-10 Thread weeklyteam
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 385, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9765/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [HOT] Buildings and HOT's reputation in OSM

2017-12-10 Thread Scott Davies
>From a validation point of view does it matter if the building is not square? Is it acceptable to square a building even though we know this will introduce an element of approximation or error. John, just on this one point, I'm not sure this is true. The 'element of approximation' is inherent