Hello -
This is probably a somewhat basic question about editing for HOT tasks.
As I have been editing in various HOT tasks, I have been adding
something like source=Bing (where that is the imagery) onto every
road, every building, every ... everything that I create. Need I bother
with this?
I
It's more logical to put it on the changeset.
Like when you draw a building, and add source=bing. But then someone who
lives there gives it a name, and forgets to alter the source, the object
has data that can't be derived from the source. So it's in fact your edit
operation that has a source,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:51:52 +0100
Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com wrote:
It's more logical to put it on the changeset.
Like when you draw a building, and add source=bing. But then someone
who lives there gives it a name, and forgets to alter the source, the
object has data that can't
There was another thread relating to this a short while ago, so there's
more relevant discussion there.
Two notes:
The source tag can hold other info besides imagery, e.g. it could tell who
or what agency provided some item of information. The iD imagery_used tag
is more specific. But
To take this slightly further in JOSM when you upload it takes the title of
the imagery so where I'm working its DigitalGlobe’s WorldView-2 however I
have noticed some mapping being done that is consistently out compared to
the DigitalGlobe imagery but matches up exactly with the available Bing
On 11/3/2014 2:01 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
I had wondered about this when I saw multiple source values on an
object. I mean, which other attributes came from which source?
Technically the source should map to the subset of the attributes that
were observed from that source, but in real life, I
Hi, Pat,
Looking at OSM using the iD editor, when I type in “image” the only relevant
tags that pop up are “image”, “source:imagery”, and “source_type_imagery”;
“imagery_used” is not an option, I have to type it in explicitly. Does this
mean it’s not a very commonly used tag (?).
It would be
