On Mon, October 8, 2018 1:02 am, Harry Wood wrote:
>
>> Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
>> If one needs number to report back to donors, then integrate this
>> sort of thing with the task manager - and explain to donors how
>> erroneous data is sharply negative value
>
> I think this little "number to
Well this is drifting off the original topic but...
Greg Morgan wrote:
> This is nothing more than an uneducated attack on my favorite part of the
> US tax code, 501.c3. This is also nothing more than an attack on a group
> trying to build the OSM community.
Seems a bit strong. Some folks need
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:24 AM Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> On Mon, October 1, 2018 9:56 am, Nate Smith wrote:
>
>
> If one needs number to report back to donors, then integrate this sort of
> thing with the task manager - and explain to donors how erroneous data is
> sharply negative value, that
On Mon, October 1, 2018 9:56 am, Nate Smith wrote:
>
> If you have some ideas on additional quality metrics we could add, that
> would be great as this tool is just getting started. I would definitely
> like to include more ways we can think about what quality data means
> during field mapping.
Thanks for the comment and questions Frederik. Agreed that quality and
quantity isn’t exactly the same. And I hope that the UI in the tool hasn’t
communicated that this is just about statistics and quantity - it is more
than just a feature counter.
We certainly could say it is a richness monitor,
