Hello David,
On Jul 24 19:24 Suffield, David wrote (shortened):
This looks like a case where we don't necessarily follow
the Sane specification. Since the old hpaio code ignored localOnly
and seemed to work ok, I see no reason for not changing it back.
Yesterday I did a very quick search
Hello,
On Jul 24 00:18 Suffield, David wrote (shortened):
Why would you use saned with a networked PS C5180? Since the PS C5180 is
networked, you can use xsane from any PC without saned.
I do not understand this.
When a device is connected via ethernet, it is not sufficient
to run only a
Thanks everybody for your feedback. Now I have a better understanding of your
use case. This looks like a case where we don't necessarily follow the Sane
specification. Since the old hpaio code ignored localOnly and seemed to work
ok, I see no reason for not changing it back. It should be fixed
