According to J. op den Brouw:
> Time to try to include the SSL patch permanently in, say, 3.1.7?
>
> "Joe R. Jah" wrote:
> > FYI,
> >
> > ssl.9 33
Most definitely not! I don't have statistics on how many downloads
htdig-3.1.6.tar.gz has gotten, but it's very likely on
FYI,
Sun Mar 17 14:53:12 PST 2002
ssl.9 43
timet_enddate.1 32
Makefile.0 24
documentation.1 23
metadate.0 19
NUL.0 19
documentation.2 16
redirect.0
FYI,
Sun Mar 10 10:19:35 PST 2002
ssl.9 41
timet_enddate.1 28
Makefile.0 23
documentation.1 21
metadate.0 17
NUL.0 16
documentation.2 13
redirect.0
Time to try to include the SSL patch permanently in, say, 3.1.7?
"Joe R. Jah" wrote:
>
> FYI,
>
> ssl.9 33
> timet_enddate.1 22
> Makefile.0 21
> NUL.0 16
> metadate.0 16
> documentatio
FYI,
ssl.9 33
timet_enddate.1 22
Makefile.0 21
NUL.0 16
metadate.0 16
documentation.1 16
documentation.2 12
redirect.0 10
AdjustableLo
