> Right, I know. But there's "new" and there's "not part of many recent
> non-Linux OSes."
>
> I'd simply like to get an idea of how often the build for ht://Dig is
> going to now suddenly require building libiconv in addition to the
> Berkeley code and our own code as we do now...
>
> The answ
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Neal Richter wrote:
> I ran into the same problem on Windows 2000 & cygwin 1.1.0
>
> libiconv and iconv are new.
Right, I know. But there's "new" and there's "not part of many recent
non-Linux OSes."
I'd simply like to get an idea of how often the build for ht:/
Hey all,
I ran into the same problem on Windows 2000 & cygwin 1.1.0
libiconv and iconv are new.
I went and got libiconv-1.7.tar.gz from
http://www.gnu.org/software/libiconv/
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/libiconv/
I'm currently compiling it on windows...
Redhat 4.2 may work as well