From: Chris Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>and produces an easy to read and debug html page.
I may not agree with this. If you're in the reading and debugging stage, don't
use the filter option. If the whitespace (which you added to the template to
make the template readable) interferes with your re
Rumour has it Mark A. Fuller, on or about 08.Feb.2006 17:46, whispered:
> But, as someone said back then: white space in HTML is not "display".
> Viewing HTML is not "presentation." I ended up agreeing with that.
Ah, I am not so sure. It so happens that the HTML spec allows you to ignore
whitespa
From: Alex Teslik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am dealing with the formatting of a lot of plain text in and tags.
You can write a regex to remove whitespace only following TMPL_* tags. It
doesn't have to remove *just* linefeeds or remove all linefeeds in the file.
> I think the additional whites
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:30:16 -0700 (GMT-07:00), Mark A. Fuller wrote
> I raised this issue a year or two ago and it wasn't well-received.
Hi Mark,
I completely agree that the filter option is an excellent feature, but I'm
not certain it is the right feature to use for stripping linefeeds. I am
From: Chris Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>H:T, in my view, is most useful to separate display from code. Adding more
>layers and wrappers of code to affect display is counter-productive.
I fully understand your argument because *I* made it a year or two ago. I feel
like I'm arguing against myself. :
Wasn't there a push a while back to have a HTML::Template::Filter class
that would have commonly used filters?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark A. Fuller
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:30 PM
To: Alex Teslik; html-template-users
Rumour has it Mark A. Fuller, on or about 08.Feb.2006 16:30, whispered:
> I raised this issue a year or two ago and it wasn't well-received.
> It seems like it's common for newcomers (as I was) to spot this
> and believe it's a shortcoming in H::T.
Look, of course there are ways around it, with mu
From: Alex Teslik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Is there a switch (feature request?) that will tell HTMLTMPL to replace a
>TMPL followed by [\n\r]+ with nothing - even better replace the whole line if
>the only thing on the line is a TMPL tag?
I raised this issue a year or two ago and it wasn't well-recei
I think a filter function would do this for you easily.
Something like this:
my $filter = sub {
my $text_ref = shift;
$$text_ref =~ s/(]>)[\r\n]+/$1/g;
};
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Fe
Rumour has it Alex Kapranoff, on or about 08.Feb.2006 12:57, whispered:
> * Alex Teslik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [February 08 2006, 20:43]:
>>Is there a switch (feature request?) that will tell HTMLTMPL to replace a
>> TMPL followed by [\n\r]+ with nothing - even better replace the whole line if
* Alex Teslik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [February 08 2006, 20:43]:
>Is there a switch (feature request?) that will tell HTMLTMPL to replace a
> TMPL followed by [\n\r]+ with nothing - even better replace the whole line if
> the only thing on the line is a TMPL tag? Currently, the TMPL tags are
> remo
Hello,
Is there a switch (feature request?) that will tell HTMLTMPL to replace a
TMPL followed by [\n\r]+ with nothing - even better replace the whole line if
the only thing on the line is a TMPL tag? Currently, the TMPL tags are
removed, but the \n or \r that trail them are not. The result is
12 matches
Mail list logo
