> Lastly, if you absolutely gotta have more speed, you could try
> HTML::Template::JIT. It's got some drawbacks - not all of
> HTML::Template's syntax is supported and compilation times are long -
> but it is reliably 4 to 8 times faster.
You also might look into HTML::Template::Pro. Its latest
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Matthew wrote:
>> Also, are you loading many templates and doing includes manually?
>> Switching to tmpl_include (which is processed at compile time) can be
>
> Not sure what you mean.
Some people do stuff like:
my $header = HTML::Template->new(...);
my $body =
Sam,
> Are you pre-caching your templates in startup.pl? There's a recipe
Nope. I found the recipe and will try to incorporate that later this
week.
> Also, are you loading many templates and doing includes manually?
> Switching to tmpl_include (which is processed at compile time) can
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Matthew wrote:
>I've already got "use HTML::Template" in my startup.pl so
> theoretically its being compiled at server start (anyway to verify
> this?). But its the instantiation in my handler() routine that's using
> the CPU time.
>
> How I can I get H:T to preform better
Thanx! We have just updated to 2.8 VERSION, hopefully it works out
"unknown item in parsed stack" error. I'll let you know if we still
have problems with this.
2006/6/9, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
>
> > HTML::Template INST_VERSION 2.6
>
> Please up
