Hi list,
Sometime ago I posted a message regarding having an updated H::T which
had support for "die_on_missing_params" - a feature requested by Joshua
Ball.
As a side effect of a machine update, I have managed to loose the
patch... If Joshua is still on the list, could you please email me
update
Hi List,
[ Eventually I will post a patch to H::T to a webpage, in the meantime I
have sent an update version directly to Joshua. If others are
interested in this patch, shoot me a email. ]
> I am happy to say that I haven't run into any problems using Mathew's
> patch. It's exactly what I wante
Hi list,
I am happy to say that I haven't run into any problems using Mathew's
patch. It's exactly what I wanted/needed! Thanks!
I do have a feature request though:
Currently if I leave out 2 params, it only notifies me that one of
them is missing. It would be nice if I was told when both were
m
Thanks! I'll start using it and let you know if I run into any problems.
On 5/31/07, Mathew Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> Patch sent directly to Josh so as to avoid the list noise. If people are
> interested, I will post it (and the test cases).
>
> cheers,
> Mathew
>
Joshua wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> (I'm sorry if I double posted this. However, the first time I sent it, I was
> not subscribed to the mailing list, so I don't think it went through.)
>
> I find the "die_on_bad_params => 1" to be a very useful feature. Setting it
> to 0 is kind of like debugging Per
Hi List,
Patch sent directly to Josh so as to avoid the list noise. If people
are interested, I will post it (and the test cases).
cheers,
Mathew
Joshua Ball wrote:
> Hi Mathew,
>
> (This is the same Josh as @highgatecross. My e-mail there is down, so
> I subscribed from another address. :->)
Hi Mathew,
(This is the same Josh as @highgatecross. My e-mail there is down, so
I subscribed from another address. :->)
That's exactly what I'm looking for. I'm dealing with legacy code
which has highly nested includes in the templates. From what I've been
able to tell, I don't think the origina
Short answer: no there isn't such a feature.
However I do have a patch I use to add this ability - with one caveat...
the patch changes the behaviour such that if your code never implemented:
$ht->param(parm_name => undef);
but did rely on the undef'ness of param_name, then your code would need
Greetings.
(I'm sorry if I double posted this. However, the first time I sent it, I was
not subscribed to the mailing list, so I don't think it went through.)
I find the "die_on_bad_params => 1" to be a very useful feature. Setting it
to 0 is kind of like debugging Perl without "use strict;".
Ho
